2008-09-24 09:55:00

by Christian O. Andersson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: hci_read_remote_name_with_clock_offset vs hci_read_remote_name

Hey guys,

Please bare with me as I'm just starting to learn the concepts of
hci-traffic. I hope this is the right place to ask.

I was wondering - is there any performance gain in preferring
'hci_read_remote_name_with_clock_offset' to 'hci_read_remote_name' if
you already know the clock offset (from a previous inquiry).

Looking at the source code it seems as though the latter only calls the
former with the clock offset set to 0?