>From 69596948eb2172080bb950d99dc90678ead08305 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: root <root@SBC_PC_3.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:59:56 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] The routine bcsp_pkt_cull doesn't ack the packets properly
if multiple packets are queued. The counter i must increase before
doing comparison.
Signed-off-by: Wending Weng <[email protected]>
---
drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
index 894b2cb..cd30f39 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static void bcsp_pkt_cull(struct bcsp_struct *bcsp)
i = 0;
skb_queue_walk_safe(&bcsp->unack, skb, tmp) {
- if (i++ >= pkts_to_be_removed)
+ if (++i >= pkts_to_be_removed)
break;
__skb_unlink(skb, &bcsp->unack);
--
1.5.2.1
Hi Wending,
> >looks good, but I need a patch that applies with bluetooth-testing.git
> >tree. And please create it with git format-patch.
> >
>
> Below is the patch created with bluetooth-testing.git tree, let me know if it's not done properly, I'm not very experienced with open source.
your mailer is fully broken. It messes up tabes and whitespaces :(
It did fix it manually now, but next time it is up to you.
Regards
Marcel
Hi Marcel,
>Hi Wending,
>looks good, but I need a patch that applies with bluetooth-testing.git
>tree. And please create it with git format-patch.
>
>Regards
>
>Marcel
Below is the patch created with bluetooth-testing.git tree, let me know if it's not done properly, I'm not very experienced with open source.
>From 5c6e77cb6ea3ba6fa5c777d151c480451602bfc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: root <root@SBC_PC_3.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:05:17 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] The routine bcsp_pkt_cull displays the false error message
"Removed only %u out of %u pkts" when multiple to be acked packets are queued.
As if (i++ >= pkts_to_be_removed)
break;
will break the loop and increase the counter i when i==pkts_to_be_removed,
the loop ends up with i=pkts_to_be_removed+1. The following line:
if (i != pkts_to_be_removed) {
BT_ERR("Removed only %u out of %u pkts", i, pkts_to_be_removed);
}
will display the false message.
The counter i must not increase on the same line.
signed-off-by: Wending Weng [email protected]
---
drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
index 894b2cb..40aec0f 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
@@ -373,8 +373,9 @@ static void bcsp_pkt_cull(struct bcsp_struct *bcsp)
i = 0;
skb_queue_walk_safe(&bcsp->unack, skb, tmp) {
- if (i++ >= pkts_to_be_removed)
+ if (i >= pkts_to_be_removed)
break;
+ i++;
__skb_unlink(skb, &bcsp->unack);
kfree_skb(skb);
--
1.5.2.1
regards
Wending
Hi Wending,
> replace >= with > will not work. Below is the new patch.
>
> From: root <root@SBC_PC_3.localdomain>
> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:06:18 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] The routine bcsp_pkt_cull displays the false error message
> "Removed only %u out of %u pkts" when multiple to be acked packets are queued.
> As if (i++ >= pkts_to_be_removed)
> break;
> will breaks the loop and increase the counter i when i==pkts_to_be_removed,
> the loop ends up with i=pkts_to_be_removed+1. The following line:
> if (i != pkts_to_be_removed) {
> BT_ERR("Removed only %u out of %u pkts", i, pkts_to_be_removed);
> }
> will display the false message.
> The counter i must not increase on the same line.
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
> index 894b2cb..40aec0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
> @@ -373,8 +373,9 @@ static void bcsp_pkt_cull(struct bcsp_struct *bcsp)
>
> i = 0;
> skb_queue_walk_safe(&bcsp->unack, skb, tmp) {
> - if (i++ >= pkts_to_be_removed)
> + if (i >= pkts_to_be_removed)
> break;
> + i++;
>
> __skb_unlink(skb, &bcsp->unack);
> kfree_skb(skb);
looks good, but I need a patch that applies with bluetooth-testing.git
tree. And please create it with git format-patch.
Regards
Marcel
Hi Marcel,
>Not following? I am saying replace >=3D with >. Would that work too?
>Otherwise please send a patch with a more detailed commit message.
>
>Regards
>
>Marcel
replace >=3D with > will not work. Below is the new patch.
From: root <root@SBC_PC_3.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:06:18 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] The routine bcsp_pkt_cull displays the false error message
"Removed only %u out of %u pkts" when multiple to be acked packets are queu=
ed.
As if (i++ >=3D pkts_to_be_removed)
break;
will breaks the loop and increase the counter i when i=3D=3Dpkts_to_be_r=
emoved,
the loop ends up with i=3Dpkts_to_be_removed+1. The following line:
if (i !=3D pkts_to_be_removed) {
BT_ERR("Removed only %u out of %u pkts", i, pkts_to_be_removed);
}
will display the false message.
The counter i must not increase on the same line.
---
drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
index 894b2cb..40aec0f 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
@@ -373,8 +373,9 @@ static void bcsp_pkt_cull(struct bcsp_struct *bcsp)
i =3D 0;
skb_queue_walk_safe(&bcsp->unack, skb, tmp) {
- if (i++ >=3D pkts_to_be_removed)
+ if (i >=3D pkts_to_be_removed)
break;
+ i++;
__skb_unlink(skb, &bcsp->unack);
kfree_skb(skb);
--
1.5.2.1
Regards
Wending
Hi Wending,
please don't top post. Use proper inline quoting.
> If I keep "if (i++ >= pkts_to_be_removed)", the loop will end up with
> i=2 if pkts_to_be_removed==1 and the second test skb_queue_walk_safe is true,
>
> it will cause error message later on:
>
> if (i != pkts_to_be_removed) {
> BT_ERR("Removed only %u out of %u pkts", i, pkts_to_be_removed);
> }
>
> I think we should add another line for i++.
Not following? I am saying replace >= with >. Would that work too?
Otherwise please send a patch with a more detailed commit message.
Regards
Marcel
Hi Marcel,
If I keep "if (i++ >=3D pkts_to_be_removed)", the loop will end up =
with
i=3D2 if pkts_to_be_removed=3D=3D1 and the second test skb_queue_wa=
lk_safe is true,
it will cause error message later on:
if (i !=3D pkts_to_be_removed) {
BT_ERR("Removed only %u out of %u pkts", i, pkts_to_be_remo=
ved);
}
I think we should add another line for i++.
Regards
Wending Weng
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Marcel
Holtmann
Sent: August 22, 2009 4:06 PM
To: Weng, Wending
Cc: '[email protected]'
Subject: Re: patch for hci_bcsp.c(2.6.31.-rc1)
Hi Wending,
> From 69596948eb2172080bb950d99dc90678ead08305 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: root <root@SBC_PC_3.localdomain>
> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:59:56 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] The routine bcsp_pkt_cull doesn't ack the packets proper=
ly
> if multiple packets are queued. The counter i must increase before
> doing comparison.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wending Weng <[email protected]>
>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
> index 894b2cb..cd30f39 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
> @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static void bcsp_pkt_cull(struct bcsp_struct *bcsp)
>
> i =3D 0;
> skb_queue_walk_safe(&bcsp->unack, skb, tmp) {
> - if (i++ >=3D pkts_to_be_removed)
> + if (++i >=3D pkts_to_be_removed)
> break;
wouldn't be if (i++ > pkts_to_be_removed) the better way to test this?
Regards
Marcel
Hi Wending,
> From 69596948eb2172080bb950d99dc90678ead08305 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: root <root@SBC_PC_3.localdomain>
> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:59:56 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] The routine bcsp_pkt_cull doesn't ack the packets properly
> if multiple packets are queued. The counter i must increase before
> doing comparison.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wending Weng <[email protected]>
>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
> index 894b2cb..cd30f39 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
> @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static void bcsp_pkt_cull(struct bcsp_struct *bcsp)
>
> i = 0;
> skb_queue_walk_safe(&bcsp->unack, skb, tmp) {
> - if (i++ >= pkts_to_be_removed)
> + if (++i >= pkts_to_be_removed)
> break;
wouldn't be if (i++ > pkts_to_be_removed) the better way to test this?
Regards
Marcel