Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A235C43387 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 01:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4CF20879 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 01:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ieee.org header.i=@ieee.org header.b="Hsrywo5f" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727846AbfAKBaw (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:30:52 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:37871 "EHLO mail-qt1-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729063AbfAKBaw (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:30:52 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f174.google.com with SMTP id t33so16448665qtt.4 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 17:30:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y78WuhZfchwTZqaVMk+cPeeKUwiaoxZM717zWYc7aiY=; b=Hsrywo5fp3C4upQRhU/yQka1Rl9p0FJnPOirt+YQLgdwZeNAt24WFKOQb0R6ZgvmHH R4fzGMCPaOSQn1CgTh4wl+XOOOPGPOqnxQ5TgIr8gfN7GHVn9+1W8mDv3DgKmSrYthkO o14qX1PYgfWSf3oY/2qYE0f0eHUS5tNy5u3Ss= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y78WuhZfchwTZqaVMk+cPeeKUwiaoxZM717zWYc7aiY=; b=dSx/5wkF6c5vA+JfZScEQo32uLbY3/Rr8pIvXVCvQnC1iiGG1gQ4RqiWGOhvoixNrv +LUB/3hHN1rSmyo5e0DFKsEEzRc7cSO0Y6xrQ4rpqfvw5nGAc334a/nche+JImqmX8Ki gb5usiTWJUprLIibL7YoPloNpggroLWVlJvAMi/b0iiubHU4BUU9Nk7l/4ceQ5efJLdN 8IcGUrhbx+aZVr7YD4En1LQf0bHwGIWXF1MirG0/4BTIHqf4knR2byJiqR2nfWxP+iqS Ofo4iX6ld5AC8eWdqyNU5MyP9Ge+6P6uaD4WNKA0uaQWE1uMjJcTRbZ1kehsWtdX8hyG uLmg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcdPKLMHVg8FdCY3x9/f5+1ao2A6XeolhphsnaXIadzhEhSCd/W w+lkJpC5z2Lh/plQBOCrNeJ3ZNBGYic= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7MV7ETesDBjrSksEaClfE5ldvNbfqOWKeixdAKcKvtuqiZLo0oAQ89I+KJ0fhXHZ1LSbp/nA== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:35eb:: with SMTP id l40mr12345518qtb.165.1547170251499; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 17:30:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.190] (pool-108-15-23-247.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [108.15.23.247]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b20sm47210856qkb.17.2019.01.10.17.30.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 17:30:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] /run/systemd/units/ links To: Russell Coker , Nicolas Iooss Cc: selinux-refpolicy@vger.kernel.org References: <20190108114151.GA416@xev> <60dbf2ed-45e9-a94a-f37a-925a7c410aee@ieee.org> <4532148.u2APPhryqx@liv> From: Chris PeBenito Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:26:10 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4532148.u2APPhryqx@liv> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: selinux-refpolicy-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: selinux-refpolicy@vger.kernel.org On 1/10/19 7:28 PM, Russell Coker wrote: > On Friday, 11 January 2019 10:08:22 AM AEDT Nicolas Iooss wrote: >>> I guess this is a race between patches. Should be named >>> init_read_pid_symlinks. Same feedback as GitHub PR >>> https://github.com/SELinuxProject/refpolicy/pull/17 >> >> I like "init_read_runtime_symlinks" more than "init_read_pid_symlinks" >> so I have uploaded my Pull Request. If your prefer the second name, I >> can change it again. >> Compared to this patch, my PR does not use files_search_pids() but >> directly read_lnk_files_pattern() like some other interfaces. I have >> no strong preferences regarding this. > > I'm really not bothered by the name. Whatever gets it included in git the > fastest is good for me. > > Also I'd really like to see a new upstream release before the end of the month > if convenient. I've merged the PR, though this means the init_*_pid_*() interfaces will need to be deprecated and replaced, for consistency. -- Chris PeBenito