Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD55C10F13 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 17:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A52520850 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 17:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ieee.org header.i=@ieee.org header.b="LBSPeuju" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725829AbfDNRvJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Apr 2019 13:51:09 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f193.google.com ([209.85.222.193]:40955 "EHLO mail-qk1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725797AbfDNRvJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Apr 2019 13:51:09 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f193.google.com with SMTP id w20so8558277qka.7 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 10:51:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HBXboXPVbIx8dSegL2g7pUrzAYf94U5wx58JYs7yDPA=; b=LBSPeujuUPEJQK/yyezmQZLOn9hGYrMkhmLeIc2tYDDuiIuafX/pyEFLKDiZPSUhof 5tzrHpBR/xvANrpymdAgEdkBbzWBbpy1lCJ78eaMOhYjzPTIRtcb+ZagPg/Scuiojrrj Ft+1uGawN6z5DadE09gjvYGjKhFJYVTmU2Uy4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HBXboXPVbIx8dSegL2g7pUrzAYf94U5wx58JYs7yDPA=; b=uOuFSmJQGIaEGsbX3nRjnxTfGHrUdF+B8mHEDu8gFzLdrhXa+sEZWxWQHRRgcYEbtX Y3e1fUh3J/ywXcrtADAJKsk8OVenRDEcnuh/j4cqz2BltQgXzAcy5pFlufkrrbIQqtBA B7r6w8Et1IawA3jKdL1vUytmLEahiPCvdEPh+cy6goQj7UX01i3to3TItj6Pimh/VmoA 6ru9HYM/Z/9BvPhjDt+rg9r+ks5dxYZR4I98fOds5ItN7GFLBxDi8qMlWcmdhqswpduP 2xtKLb0hx1eum980vHCs8sxamLMTM7f1E5i/uVBzrv4r3J6ZEdp1V5hg57SDo6FQ17Az Ho6g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVaODCjKWu6QHYv00/4W56jptr1/+oO/+dQCFVLlCzKpmwVpe0p tcJlcLxriXOJkKqOUxVO4iesQBGVDdY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx08IAb0L1CUlY220A0GIh+3le1EdF2cpYfFS3tILxUIsONTF1dmqYOFKqd1pqrRKWwEBw1ng== X-Received: by 2002:ae9:f312:: with SMTP id p18mr13273570qkg.60.1555264268398; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 10:51:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.190] (pool-108-15-23-247.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [108.15.23.247]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n10sm37961731qta.86.2019.04.14.10.51.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Apr 2019 10:51:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Some items that seem they can be dontaudited for plymouthd To: Russell Coker , "Sugar, David" Cc: "selinux-refpolicy@vger.kernel.org" References: <20190412193917.23886-1-dsugar@tresys.com> <20190412193917.23886-4-dsugar@tresys.com> <2319520.MOiGnKPAe5@liv> From: Chris PeBenito Message-ID: <290b6376-a0c7-5dee-faff-4e5c9bb4a22d@ieee.org> Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 13:49:06 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2319520.MOiGnKPAe5@liv> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: selinux-refpolicy-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: selinux-refpolicy@vger.kernel.org On 4/12/19 10:33 PM, Russell Coker wrote: > What is netlink_kobject_uevent_socket? Do we have a place we can document > this sort of thing to make it easier to determine whether access is required > and what the implications of such access are? The object class/perms list should be the place. Right now its at https://selinuxproject.org/page/ObjectClassesPerms, though arguably it could move back to the refpolicy wiki not that it's on SELinux project GitHub. -- Chris PeBenito