Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of selinux-refpolicy-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: cgroups
To:     Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>,
        selinux-refpolicy@vger.kernel.org
References: <201858869.AyTo3W3VYL@liv>
From:   Chris PeBenito <pebenito@ieee.org>
Message-ID: <24316725-724b-a0e7-3233-7a8a73274359@ieee.org>
Date:   Thu, 4 Mar 2021 11:18:09 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201858869.AyTo3W3VYL@liv>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 3/4/21 6:21 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/libcg/files/
> 
> Above seems to be the source for the programs listed in policy/modules/
> services/cgroup.fc, upstream has no changes since 2014 and the package in
> Debian doesn't support cgroup2 so is pretty much useless.
> 
> Is there any reason for not deleting policy/modules/services/cgroup.* from
> refpolicy?

No.

> Also as an aside what is the best way of managing cgroups and do we have
> policy that works with it?

Probably systemd.

-- 
Chris PeBenito