Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of selinux-refpolicy-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
To:     Matej Marusak <mmarusak@redhat.com>
Reply-To: russell@coker.com.au
Cc:     selinux-refpolicy@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cockpit web admin system
Date:   Tue, 20 Apr 2021 23:31:55 +1000
Message-ID: <1637645.KEFvsIcdD4@xev>
In-Reply-To: <CAHLOwD=4oXGPniOO3yR6Gy87-iBN31ETXxeC7k+zykqFrcC7dg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <YH6gq6yWUmo93KT7@xev> <CAHLOwD=4oXGPniOO3yR6Gy87-iBN31ETXxeC7k+zykqFrcC7dg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Precedence: bulk

On Tuesday, 20 April 2021 10:48:32 PM AEST Matej Marusak wrote:
> As a Cockpit developer I would like to mention that Cockpit will ship its
> own policy very soon - it will be the same one that is currently in rawhide
> and it is possible it will involve over time. It will be shipped with
> priority 200 to suppress policy that is shipped by default.
> We first ship it in Fedora-33 and newer as well as rhel-9 and newer. We
> have a plan to ship it in Debian as well. Other OSes may come later.
> 
> This is being developed in [1].
> 
> MM
> 
> [1] https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/pull/15707

The same policy won't work for Red Hat and for Refpolicy systems (including 
Debian).  Many interfaces have different names and some interfaces do 
different things.

You will have to ship 2 policies if you want to support Red Hat and the rest.

-- 
My Main Blog         http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog    http://doc.coker.com.au/