Bruce:
I see that you are back. I have now been able to reproduce the BUG_ON
that Aime saw on the new code. I ran it over the holidays and when let
run long enough it eventually hit it.
I am testing what I think is the fix (left over XPT_BUSY clear in the
close path). If this works, then I'm ready with a new version of the
patchset based on your comments plus this bug fix.
Are you ready for the next round?
Thanks,
Tom
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 02:43:25PM -0600, Tom Tucker wrote:
> I see that you are back.
Actually, all that happens was I got a wireless router installed in my
in-laws' house. I'm still mostly goofing off.
> I have now been able to reproduce the BUG_ON
> that Aime saw on the new code. I ran it over the holidays and when let
> run long enough it eventually hit it.
>
> I am testing what I think is the fix (left over XPT_BUSY clear in the
> close path). If this works, then I'm ready with a new version of the
> patchset based on your comments plus this bug fix.
Awesome, thanks!
> Are you ready for the next round?
Feel free if you want, but I probably won't do anything with it till
late next week.
--b.
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 15:40 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 02:43:25PM -0600, Tom Tucker wrote:
> > I see that you are back.
>
> Actually, all that happens was I got a wireless router installed in my
> in-laws' house. I'm still mostly goofing off.
Ah, the family IT guy -- nice.
>
> > I have now been able to reproduce the BUG_ON
> > that Aime saw on the new code. I ran it over the holidays and when let
> > run long enough it eventually hit it.
> >
> > I am testing what I think is the fix (left over XPT_BUSY clear in the
> > close path). If this works, then I'm ready with a new version of the
> > patchset based on your comments plus this bug fix.
>
> Awesome, thanks!
>
> > Are you ready for the next round?
>
> Feel free if you want, but I probably won't do anything with it till
> late next week.
>
Ok. I'll send it out after more testing. BTW, I'll be skiing for the 1st
week of Jan, but will be semi-available via e-mail.
> --b.