2013-08-02 07:15:14

by Cong Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [Patch net-next v2 5/8] sunrpc: use generic union inet_addr

From: Cong Wang <[email protected]>

sunrpc defines some helper functions for sockaddr, actually they
can re-use the generic functions for union inet_addr too.

Cc: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/sunrpc/addr.h | 118 +++----------------------------------------
include/net/inet_addr.h | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++------
net/core/utils.c | 25 +++++++++
3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/addr.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/addr.h
index 07d8e53..10d07f6 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/addr.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/addr.h
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <linux/in.h>
#include <linux/in6.h>
#include <net/ipv6.h>
+#include <net/inet_addr.h>

size_t rpc_ntop(const struct sockaddr *, char *, const size_t);
size_t rpc_pton(struct net *, const char *, const size_t,
@@ -21,135 +22,30 @@ size_t rpc_uaddr2sockaddr(struct net *, const char *, const size_t,

static inline unsigned short rpc_get_port(const struct sockaddr *sap)
{
- switch (sap->sa_family) {
- case AF_INET:
- return ntohs(((struct sockaddr_in *)sap)->sin_port);
- case AF_INET6:
- return ntohs(((struct sockaddr_in6 *)sap)->sin6_port);
- }
- return 0;
+ return inet_addr_get_port((const union inet_addr *)sap);
}

static inline void rpc_set_port(struct sockaddr *sap,
const unsigned short port)
{
- switch (sap->sa_family) {
- case AF_INET:
- ((struct sockaddr_in *)sap)->sin_port = htons(port);
- break;
- case AF_INET6:
- ((struct sockaddr_in6 *)sap)->sin6_port = htons(port);
- break;
- }
+ inet_addr_set_port((union inet_addr *)sap, port);
}

#define IPV6_SCOPE_DELIMITER '%'
#define IPV6_SCOPE_ID_LEN sizeof("%nnnnnnnnnn")

-static inline bool __rpc_cmp_addr4(const struct sockaddr *sap1,
- const struct sockaddr *sap2)
-{
- const struct sockaddr_in *sin1 = (const struct sockaddr_in *)sap1;
- const struct sockaddr_in *sin2 = (const struct sockaddr_in *)sap2;
-
- return sin1->sin_addr.s_addr == sin2->sin_addr.s_addr;
-}
-
-static inline bool __rpc_copy_addr4(struct sockaddr *dst,
- const struct sockaddr *src)
-{
- const struct sockaddr_in *ssin = (struct sockaddr_in *) src;
- struct sockaddr_in *dsin = (struct sockaddr_in *) dst;
-
- dsin->sin_family = ssin->sin_family;
- dsin->sin_addr.s_addr = ssin->sin_addr.s_addr;
- return true;
-}
-
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
-static inline bool __rpc_cmp_addr6(const struct sockaddr *sap1,
- const struct sockaddr *sap2)
-{
- const struct sockaddr_in6 *sin1 = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *)sap1;
- const struct sockaddr_in6 *sin2 = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *)sap2;
-
- if (!ipv6_addr_equal(&sin1->sin6_addr, &sin2->sin6_addr))
- return false;
- else if (ipv6_addr_type(&sin1->sin6_addr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL)
- return sin1->sin6_scope_id == sin2->sin6_scope_id;
-
- return true;
-}
-
-static inline bool __rpc_copy_addr6(struct sockaddr *dst,
- const struct sockaddr *src)
-{
- const struct sockaddr_in6 *ssin6 = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *) src;
- struct sockaddr_in6 *dsin6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *) dst;
-
- dsin6->sin6_family = ssin6->sin6_family;
- dsin6->sin6_addr = ssin6->sin6_addr;
- dsin6->sin6_scope_id = ssin6->sin6_scope_id;
- return true;
-}
-#else /* !(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) */
-static inline bool __rpc_cmp_addr6(const struct sockaddr *sap1,
- const struct sockaddr *sap2)
-{
- return false;
-}
-
-static inline bool __rpc_copy_addr6(struct sockaddr *dst,
- const struct sockaddr *src)
-{
- return false;
-}
-#endif /* !(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) */
-
-/**
- * rpc_cmp_addr - compare the address portion of two sockaddrs.
- * @sap1: first sockaddr
- * @sap2: second sockaddr
- *
- * Just compares the family and address portion. Ignores port, but
- * compares the scope if it's a link-local address.
- *
- * Returns true if the addrs are equal, false if they aren't.
- */
static inline bool rpc_cmp_addr(const struct sockaddr *sap1,
const struct sockaddr *sap2)
{
- if (sap1->sa_family == sap2->sa_family) {
- switch (sap1->sa_family) {
- case AF_INET:
- return __rpc_cmp_addr4(sap1, sap2);
- case AF_INET6:
- return __rpc_cmp_addr6(sap1, sap2);
- }
- }
- return false;
+ return inet_addr_equal((const union inet_addr *)sap1,
+ (const union inet_addr *)sap2);
}

-/**
- * rpc_copy_addr - copy the address portion of one sockaddr to another
- * @dst: destination sockaddr
- * @src: source sockaddr
- *
- * Just copies the address portion and family. Ignores port, scope, etc.
- * Caller is responsible for making certain that dst is large enough to hold
- * the address in src. Returns true if address family is supported. Returns
- * false otherwise.
- */
static inline bool rpc_copy_addr(struct sockaddr *dst,
const struct sockaddr *src)
{
- switch (src->sa_family) {
- case AF_INET:
- return __rpc_copy_addr4(dst, src);
- case AF_INET6:
- return __rpc_copy_addr6(dst, src);
- }
- return false;
+ return inet_addr_copy((union inet_addr *)dst,
+ (const union inet_addr *)src);
}

/**
diff --git a/include/net/inet_addr.h b/include/net/inet_addr.h
index ee80df4..e846050 100644
--- a/include/net/inet_addr.h
+++ b/include/net/inet_addr.h
@@ -36,17 +36,6 @@ bool in_addr_gen_equal(const struct in_addr_gen *a, const struct in_addr_gen *b)
}

#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
-static inline
-bool inet_addr_equal(const union inet_addr *a, const union inet_addr *b)
-{
- if (a->sa.sa_family != b->sa.sa_family)
- return false;
- if (a->sa.sa_family == AF_INET6)
- return ipv6_addr_equal(&a->sin6.sin6_addr, &b->sin6.sin6_addr);
- else
- return a->sin.sin_addr.s_addr == b->sin.sin_addr.s_addr;
-}
-
static inline bool inet_addr_any(const union inet_addr *ipa)
{
if (ipa->sa.sa_family == AF_INET6)
@@ -65,12 +54,6 @@ static inline bool inet_addr_multicast(const union inet_addr *ipa)

#else /* !CONFIG_IPV6 */

-static inline
-bool inet_addr_equal(const union inet_addr *a, const union inet_addr *b)
-{
- return a->sin.sin_addr.s_addr == b->sin.sin_addr.s_addr;
-}
-
static inline bool inet_addr_any(const union inet_addr *ipa)
{
return ipa->sin.sin_addr.s_addr == htonl(INADDR_ANY);
@@ -82,6 +65,63 @@ static inline bool inet_addr_multicast(const union inet_addr *ipa)
}
#endif

+/**
+ * inet_addr_copy - copy the address portion of one inet_addr to another
+ * @dst: destination sockaddr
+ * @src: source sockaddr
+ *
+ * Just copies the address portion and family. Ignores port, scope, etc.
+ * Caller is responsible for making certain that dst is large enough to hold
+ * the address in src. Returns true if address family is supported. Returns
+ * false otherwise.
+ */
+static inline bool inet_addr_copy(union inet_addr *dst,
+ const union inet_addr *src)
+{
+ dst->sa.sa_family = src->sa.sa_family;
+
+ switch (src->sa.sa_family) {
+ case AF_INET:
+ dst->sin.sin_addr.s_addr = src->sin.sin_addr.s_addr;
+ return true;
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+ case AF_INET6:
+ dst->sin6.sin6_addr = src->sin6.sin6_addr;
+ dst->sin6.sin6_scope_id = src->sin6.sin6_scope_id;
+ return true;
+#endif
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+static inline
+unsigned short inet_addr_get_port(const union inet_addr *sap)
+{
+ switch (sap->sa.sa_family) {
+ case AF_INET:
+ return ntohs(sap->sin.sin_port);
+ case AF_INET6:
+ return ntohs(sap->sin6.sin6_port);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline
+void inet_addr_set_port(union inet_addr *sap,
+ const unsigned short port)
+{
+ switch (sap->sa.sa_family) {
+ case AF_INET:
+ sap->sin.sin_port = htons(port);
+ break;
+ case AF_INET6:
+ sap->sin6.sin6_port = htons(port);
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
+bool inet_addr_equal(const union inet_addr *a, const union inet_addr *b);
int simple_inet_pton(const char *str, union inet_addr *addr);

#endif
diff --git a/net/core/utils.c b/net/core/utils.c
index 22dd621..837bb18 100644
--- a/net/core/utils.c
+++ b/net/core/utils.c
@@ -374,3 +374,28 @@ int simple_inet_pton(const char *str, union inet_addr *addr)
return -EINVAL;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_inet_pton);
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+bool inet_addr_equal(const union inet_addr *a, const union inet_addr *b)
+{
+ if (a->sa.sa_family != b->sa.sa_family)
+ return false;
+ else if (a->sa.sa_family == AF_INET6) {
+ if (!ipv6_addr_equal(&a->sin6.sin6_addr, &b->sin6.sin6_addr))
+ return false;
+ else if (__ipv6_addr_needs_scope_id(__ipv6_addr_type(&a->sin6.sin6_addr)))
+ return a->sin6.sin6_scope_id == b->sin6.sin6_scope_id;
+ else
+ return true;
+ } else
+ return a->sin.sin_addr.s_addr == b->sin.sin_addr.s_addr;
+}
+#else
+bool inet_addr_equal(const union inet_addr *a, const union inet_addr *b)
+{
+ if (a->sa.sa_family == AF_UNSPEC)
+ return a->sa.sa_family == b->sa.sa_family;
+ return a->sin.sin_addr.s_addr == b->sin.sin_addr.s_addr;
+}
+#endif
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_addr_equal);
--
1.7.7.6



2013-08-07 12:27:42

by Cong Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 5/8] sunrpc: use generic union inet_addr

On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 06:28 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> My question is a bit more fundamental: Why are you using this new union
> in your patches instead of simply passing around "struct sockaddr"
> pointers? If you did that, then you could simply replace all of the
> rpc_* wrappers with your generic ones, since you wouldn't need to do
> the cast to this (seemingly unnecessary) union.

Because there are some places have to interpret the structure, without
this union, they need to cast to either sockaddr_in or sockaddr_in6
first, which is not as pretty as using a union.

For example, the code in netpoll:

ipv6_addr_equal(daddr, &np->local_ip.sin6.sin6_addr)

without the union, it would be:

struct sockaddr_in6 *addr = (struct sockaddr_in6 *) &np->local_ip;
ipv6_addr_equal(daddr, addr->sin6_addr);

>
> FWIW, I too am happy to see these routines moved to common code. I just
> wonder whether it might make more sense to use the existing convention
> instead of this new union.
>

Thanks.


2013-08-07 13:30:58

by Jim Rees

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 5/8] sunrpc: use generic union inet_addr

Cong Wang wrote:

On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 06:28 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> My question is a bit more fundamental: Why are you using this new union
> in your patches instead of simply passing around "struct sockaddr"
> pointers? If you did that, then you could simply replace all of the
> rpc_* wrappers with your generic ones, since you wouldn't need to do
> the cast to this (seemingly unnecessary) union.

Because there are some places have to interpret the structure, without
this union, they need to cast to either sockaddr_in or sockaddr_in6
first, which is not as pretty as using a union.

For example, the code in netpoll:

ipv6_addr_equal(daddr, &np->local_ip.sin6.sin6_addr)

without the union, it would be:

struct sockaddr_in6 *addr = (struct sockaddr_in6 *) &np->local_ip;
ipv6_addr_equal(daddr, addr->sin6_addr);

Too bad ipv6_addr_equal() doesn't take a (void *).

2013-08-05 03:14:27

by Cong Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 5/8] sunrpc: use generic union inet_addr

On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 09:36 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2013 15:14:31 +0800
> Cong Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > From: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
> >
> > sunrpc defines some helper functions for sockaddr, actually they
> > can re-use the generic functions for union inet_addr too.
>
> Only some of these patches in this series have made it to lists to
> which I'm subscribed, so I may be missing some context here...
>
> I'm not sure I really understand the value of "union inet_addr". Why
> not just use the conventional method of passing around "struct sockaddr"
> pointers, and then casting them to struct sockaddr_in/sockaddr_in6
> depending on what the sa_family is set to?

Yes.

>
> With that you wouldn't need to leave the (now pointless) rpc_* wrappers
> in place and could just call your new helpers directly.
>

J. Bruce asked the same question, see:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=137475685903460&w=2

Thanks.


2013-08-08 01:37:42

by Cong Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 5/8] sunrpc: use generic union inet_addr

On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 09:21 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Ok, good point. That does look cleaner. I'd still like to see the rpc_*
> wrappers go away, but that can be done later.
>

I will move the wrappers to generic since several people asked.



2013-08-06 10:28:11

by Jeff Layton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 5/8] sunrpc: use generic union inet_addr

On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 11:14:05 +0800
Cong Wang <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 09:36 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Aug 2013 15:14:31 +0800
> > Cong Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > sunrpc defines some helper functions for sockaddr, actually they
> > > can re-use the generic functions for union inet_addr too.
> >
> > Only some of these patches in this series have made it to lists to
> > which I'm subscribed, so I may be missing some context here...
> >
> > I'm not sure I really understand the value of "union inet_addr". Why
> > not just use the conventional method of passing around "struct sockaddr"
> > pointers, and then casting them to struct sockaddr_in/sockaddr_in6
> > depending on what the sa_family is set to?
>
> Yes.
>
> >
> > With that you wouldn't need to leave the (now pointless) rpc_* wrappers
> > in place and could just call your new helpers directly.
> >
>
> J. Bruce asked the same question, see:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=137475685903460&w=2
>

Not exactly...

He asked why you were keeping the wrappers and you replied that it was
because you didn't want to change all of the callers of rpc_get_port.
That's a fair enough answer to his question.

My question is a bit more fundamental: Why are you using this new union
in your patches instead of simply passing around "struct sockaddr"
pointers? If you did that, then you could simply replace all of the
rpc_* wrappers with your generic ones, since you wouldn't need to do
the cast to this (seemingly unnecessary) union.

FWIW, I too am happy to see these routines moved to common code. I just
wonder whether it might make more sense to use the existing convention
instead of this new union.

--
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>

2013-08-07 13:21:32

by Jeff Layton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 5/8] sunrpc: use generic union inet_addr

On Wed, 07 Aug 2013 20:27:26 +0800
Cong Wang <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 06:28 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> >
> > My question is a bit more fundamental: Why are you using this new union
> > in your patches instead of simply passing around "struct sockaddr"
> > pointers? If you did that, then you could simply replace all of the
> > rpc_* wrappers with your generic ones, since you wouldn't need to do
> > the cast to this (seemingly unnecessary) union.
>
> Because there are some places have to interpret the structure, without
> this union, they need to cast to either sockaddr_in or sockaddr_in6
> first, which is not as pretty as using a union.
>
> For example, the code in netpoll:
>
> ipv6_addr_equal(daddr, &np->local_ip.sin6.sin6_addr)
>
> without the union, it would be:
>
> struct sockaddr_in6 *addr = (struct sockaddr_in6 *) &np->local_ip;
> ipv6_addr_equal(daddr, addr->sin6_addr);
>
> >
> > FWIW, I too am happy to see these routines moved to common code. I just
> > wonder whether it might make more sense to use the existing convention
> > instead of this new union.
> >
>

Ok, good point. That does look cleaner. I'd still like to see the rpc_*
wrappers go away, but that can be done later.

--
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>

2013-08-02 13:36:34

by Jeff Layton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 5/8] sunrpc: use generic union inet_addr

On Fri, 2 Aug 2013 15:14:31 +0800
Cong Wang <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
>
> sunrpc defines some helper functions for sockaddr, actually they
> can re-use the generic functions for union inet_addr too.

Only some of these patches in this series have made it to lists to
which I'm subscribed, so I may be missing some context here...

I'm not sure I really understand the value of "union inet_addr". Why
not just use the conventional method of passing around "struct sockaddr"
pointers, and then casting them to struct sockaddr_in/sockaddr_in6
depending on what the sa_family is set to?

With that you wouldn't need to leave the (now pointless) rpc_* wrappers
in place and could just call your new helpers directly.

>
> Cc: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/linux/sunrpc/addr.h | 118 +++----------------------------------------
> include/net/inet_addr.h | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> net/core/utils.c | 25 +++++++++
> 3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/addr.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/addr.h
> index 07d8e53..10d07f6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/addr.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/addr.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <linux/in.h>
> #include <linux/in6.h>
> #include <net/ipv6.h>
> +#include <net/inet_addr.h>
>
> size_t rpc_ntop(const struct sockaddr *, char *, const size_t);
> size_t rpc_pton(struct net *, const char *, const size_t,
> @@ -21,135 +22,30 @@ size_t rpc_uaddr2sockaddr(struct net *, const char *, const size_t,
>
> static inline unsigned short rpc_get_port(const struct sockaddr *sap)
> {
> - switch (sap->sa_family) {
> - case AF_INET:
> - return ntohs(((struct sockaddr_in *)sap)->sin_port);
> - case AF_INET6:
> - return ntohs(((struct sockaddr_in6 *)sap)->sin6_port);
> - }
> - return 0;
> + return inet_addr_get_port((const union inet_addr *)sap);
> }
>
> static inline void rpc_set_port(struct sockaddr *sap,
> const unsigned short port)
> {
> - switch (sap->sa_family) {
> - case AF_INET:
> - ((struct sockaddr_in *)sap)->sin_port = htons(port);
> - break;
> - case AF_INET6:
> - ((struct sockaddr_in6 *)sap)->sin6_port = htons(port);
> - break;
> - }
> + inet_addr_set_port((union inet_addr *)sap, port);
> }
>
> #define IPV6_SCOPE_DELIMITER '%'
> #define IPV6_SCOPE_ID_LEN sizeof("%nnnnnnnnnn")
>
> -static inline bool __rpc_cmp_addr4(const struct sockaddr *sap1,
> - const struct sockaddr *sap2)
> -{
> - const struct sockaddr_in *sin1 = (const struct sockaddr_in *)sap1;
> - const struct sockaddr_in *sin2 = (const struct sockaddr_in *)sap2;
> -
> - return sin1->sin_addr.s_addr == sin2->sin_addr.s_addr;
> -}
> -
> -static inline bool __rpc_copy_addr4(struct sockaddr *dst,
> - const struct sockaddr *src)
> -{
> - const struct sockaddr_in *ssin = (struct sockaddr_in *) src;
> - struct sockaddr_in *dsin = (struct sockaddr_in *) dst;
> -
> - dsin->sin_family = ssin->sin_family;
> - dsin->sin_addr.s_addr = ssin->sin_addr.s_addr;
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> -static inline bool __rpc_cmp_addr6(const struct sockaddr *sap1,
> - const struct sockaddr *sap2)
> -{
> - const struct sockaddr_in6 *sin1 = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *)sap1;
> - const struct sockaddr_in6 *sin2 = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *)sap2;
> -
> - if (!ipv6_addr_equal(&sin1->sin6_addr, &sin2->sin6_addr))
> - return false;
> - else if (ipv6_addr_type(&sin1->sin6_addr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL)
> - return sin1->sin6_scope_id == sin2->sin6_scope_id;
> -
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> -static inline bool __rpc_copy_addr6(struct sockaddr *dst,
> - const struct sockaddr *src)
> -{
> - const struct sockaddr_in6 *ssin6 = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *) src;
> - struct sockaddr_in6 *dsin6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *) dst;
> -
> - dsin6->sin6_family = ssin6->sin6_family;
> - dsin6->sin6_addr = ssin6->sin6_addr;
> - dsin6->sin6_scope_id = ssin6->sin6_scope_id;
> - return true;
> -}
> -#else /* !(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) */
> -static inline bool __rpc_cmp_addr6(const struct sockaddr *sap1,
> - const struct sockaddr *sap2)
> -{
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> -static inline bool __rpc_copy_addr6(struct sockaddr *dst,
> - const struct sockaddr *src)
> -{
> - return false;
> -}
> -#endif /* !(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) */
> -
> -/**
> - * rpc_cmp_addr - compare the address portion of two sockaddrs.
> - * @sap1: first sockaddr
> - * @sap2: second sockaddr
> - *
> - * Just compares the family and address portion. Ignores port, but
> - * compares the scope if it's a link-local address.
> - *
> - * Returns true if the addrs are equal, false if they aren't.
> - */
> static inline bool rpc_cmp_addr(const struct sockaddr *sap1,
> const struct sockaddr *sap2)
> {
> - if (sap1->sa_family == sap2->sa_family) {
> - switch (sap1->sa_family) {
> - case AF_INET:
> - return __rpc_cmp_addr4(sap1, sap2);
> - case AF_INET6:
> - return __rpc_cmp_addr6(sap1, sap2);
> - }
> - }
> - return false;
> + return inet_addr_equal((const union inet_addr *)sap1,
> + (const union inet_addr *)sap2);
> }
>
> -/**
> - * rpc_copy_addr - copy the address portion of one sockaddr to another
> - * @dst: destination sockaddr
> - * @src: source sockaddr
> - *
> - * Just copies the address portion and family. Ignores port, scope, etc.
> - * Caller is responsible for making certain that dst is large enough to hold
> - * the address in src. Returns true if address family is supported. Returns
> - * false otherwise.
> - */
> static inline bool rpc_copy_addr(struct sockaddr *dst,
> const struct sockaddr *src)
> {
> - switch (src->sa_family) {
> - case AF_INET:
> - return __rpc_copy_addr4(dst, src);
> - case AF_INET6:
> - return __rpc_copy_addr6(dst, src);
> - }
> - return false;
> + return inet_addr_copy((union inet_addr *)dst,
> + (const union inet_addr *)src);
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/include/net/inet_addr.h b/include/net/inet_addr.h
> index ee80df4..e846050 100644
> --- a/include/net/inet_addr.h
> +++ b/include/net/inet_addr.h
> @@ -36,17 +36,6 @@ bool in_addr_gen_equal(const struct in_addr_gen *a, const struct in_addr_gen *b)
> }
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> -static inline
> -bool inet_addr_equal(const union inet_addr *a, const union inet_addr *b)
> -{
> - if (a->sa.sa_family != b->sa.sa_family)
> - return false;
> - if (a->sa.sa_family == AF_INET6)
> - return ipv6_addr_equal(&a->sin6.sin6_addr, &b->sin6.sin6_addr);
> - else
> - return a->sin.sin_addr.s_addr == b->sin.sin_addr.s_addr;
> -}
> -
> static inline bool inet_addr_any(const union inet_addr *ipa)
> {
> if (ipa->sa.sa_family == AF_INET6)
> @@ -65,12 +54,6 @@ static inline bool inet_addr_multicast(const union inet_addr *ipa)
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_IPV6 */
>
> -static inline
> -bool inet_addr_equal(const union inet_addr *a, const union inet_addr *b)
> -{
> - return a->sin.sin_addr.s_addr == b->sin.sin_addr.s_addr;
> -}
> -
> static inline bool inet_addr_any(const union inet_addr *ipa)
> {
> return ipa->sin.sin_addr.s_addr == htonl(INADDR_ANY);
> @@ -82,6 +65,63 @@ static inline bool inet_addr_multicast(const union inet_addr *ipa)
> }
> #endif
>
> +/**
> + * inet_addr_copy - copy the address portion of one inet_addr to another
> + * @dst: destination sockaddr
> + * @src: source sockaddr
> + *
> + * Just copies the address portion and family. Ignores port, scope, etc.
> + * Caller is responsible for making certain that dst is large enough to hold
> + * the address in src. Returns true if address family is supported. Returns
> + * false otherwise.
> + */
> +static inline bool inet_addr_copy(union inet_addr *dst,
> + const union inet_addr *src)
> +{
> + dst->sa.sa_family = src->sa.sa_family;
> +
> + switch (src->sa.sa_family) {
> + case AF_INET:
> + dst->sin.sin_addr.s_addr = src->sin.sin_addr.s_addr;
> + return true;
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> + case AF_INET6:
> + dst->sin6.sin6_addr = src->sin6.sin6_addr;
> + dst->sin6.sin6_scope_id = src->sin6.sin6_scope_id;
> + return true;
> +#endif
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static inline
> +unsigned short inet_addr_get_port(const union inet_addr *sap)
> +{
> + switch (sap->sa.sa_family) {
> + case AF_INET:
> + return ntohs(sap->sin.sin_port);
> + case AF_INET6:
> + return ntohs(sap->sin6.sin6_port);
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline
> +void inet_addr_set_port(union inet_addr *sap,
> + const unsigned short port)
> +{
> + switch (sap->sa.sa_family) {
> + case AF_INET:
> + sap->sin.sin_port = htons(port);
> + break;
> + case AF_INET6:
> + sap->sin6.sin6_port = htons(port);
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +bool inet_addr_equal(const union inet_addr *a, const union inet_addr *b);
> int simple_inet_pton(const char *str, union inet_addr *addr);
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/net/core/utils.c b/net/core/utils.c
> index 22dd621..837bb18 100644
> --- a/net/core/utils.c
> +++ b/net/core/utils.c
> @@ -374,3 +374,28 @@ int simple_inet_pton(const char *str, union inet_addr *addr)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_inet_pton);
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> +bool inet_addr_equal(const union inet_addr *a, const union inet_addr *b)
> +{
> + if (a->sa.sa_family != b->sa.sa_family)
> + return false;
> + else if (a->sa.sa_family == AF_INET6) {
> + if (!ipv6_addr_equal(&a->sin6.sin6_addr, &b->sin6.sin6_addr))
> + return false;
> + else if (__ipv6_addr_needs_scope_id(__ipv6_addr_type(&a->sin6.sin6_addr)))
> + return a->sin6.sin6_scope_id == b->sin6.sin6_scope_id;
> + else
> + return true;
> + } else
> + return a->sin.sin_addr.s_addr == b->sin.sin_addr.s_addr;
> +}
> +#else
> +bool inet_addr_equal(const union inet_addr *a, const union inet_addr *b)
> +{
> + if (a->sa.sa_family == AF_UNSPEC)
> + return a->sa.sa_family == b->sa.sa_family;
> + return a->sin.sin_addr.s_addr == b->sin.sin_addr.s_addr;
> +}
> +#endif
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_addr_equal);


--
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>