On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:53:57AM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Friday May 9, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > When I disabled the NFS-server and rand my "real-world" program on a
> > single processor (make -j 1). It ran through fine. It basically
> > gets around 20 million chunks out of differnet file and assemble the
> > chuncks in a few other files. This processes more or less 5 individual
> > sections, so make can run effectively with a concurrency of 5.
>
> (For linux-nfs readers: the problem is that repeatedly opening a given
> file sometimes returns a ENOENT - http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/9/15).
>
> The mention of an NFS-server made my ears prick up...
>
> Do I understand correctly that the problem only occurs when you have
> 48 clients hammering away at the filesystem in question?
>
> Could the clients be accessing the same file that you are experiencing
> problems with? Or one of the directories in the path (if so, how
> deep).
>
> How many different files to these 20 million chunks come from? And
> how does that number compare with the first number from
> grep dentry /proc/slabinfo
> ??
>
> The NFS server does some slighty strange things with the dcache if the
> object being access is not in the cache.
>
> Also, can get a few instances of
> grep '^fh' /proc/nfs/rpc/nfsd
I think you meant /proc/net/rpc/nfsd.
--b.
>
> while things are going strange. The numbers are:
> * fh <stale> <total-lookups> <anonlookups> <dir-not-in-dcache> <nondir-not-in-dcache>
>
> That will show us if it is looking for things that aren't in the
> dcache.
>
> Finally, if the filesystem export with "subtree_check" or
> "nosubtree_check"?
> Does it make a difference if you switch the setting of this flag and
> re-export?
>
> NeilBrown
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/