From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: new transport switch BUG_ON in svc_xprt.c Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:40:41 -0500 Message-ID: <20071227204041.GB646@fieldses.org> References: <1198788205.17199.26.camel@trinity.ogc.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-nfs To: Tom Tucker Return-path: Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:38879 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752437AbXL0Ukm (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:40:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1198788205.17199.26.camel-SMNkleLxa3ZimH42XvhXlA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 02:43:25PM -0600, Tom Tucker wrote: > I see that you are back. Actually, all that happens was I got a wireless router installed in my in-laws' house. I'm still mostly goofing off. > I have now been able to reproduce the BUG_ON > that Aime saw on the new code. I ran it over the holidays and when let > run long enough it eventually hit it. > > I am testing what I think is the fix (left over XPT_BUSY clear in the > close path). If this works, then I'm ready with a new version of the > patchset based on your comments plus this bug fix. Awesome, thanks! > Are you ready for the next round? Feel free if you want, but I probably won't do anything with it till late next week. --b.