From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/38] svc: Add an svc transport class Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:54:19 -0500 Message-ID: <20071218145419.GC14783@fieldses.org> References: <20071213184506.GA29496@fieldses.org> <20071217174535.GA13515@fieldses.org> <1197937584.13463.44.camel@trinity.ogc.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: NeilBrown , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Tom Tucker Return-path: Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:45642 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754709AbXLROyW (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:54:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1197937584.13463.44.camel-SMNkleLxa3ZimH42XvhXlA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:26:24PM -0600, Tom Tucker wrote: > I've coded all of the changes that you suggested and built a new > patchset. Besides the tests I outlined in my "test matrix" are there any > other tests you would like to see performed? krb5p testing might still be interesting. > > I could not reproduce the BUG_ON from Bull. I'm wondering if it's a PPC > issue :-\ Hm, too bad, I'd like to understand that one. > > After the testing, I'll publish the revised patchset. > OK, thanks.--b.