From: Wendy Cheng Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/2] NLM failover unlock commands Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:56:31 -0500 Message-ID: <479DFB2F.104@redhat.com> References: <478D14C5.1000804@redhat.com> <18317.7319.443532.62244@notabene.brown> <478D3820.9080402@redhat.com> <20080117151007.GB16581@fieldses.org> <478F78E8.40601@redhat.com> <20080117163105.GG16581@fieldses.org> <478F82DA.4060709@redhat.com> <20080117164002.GH16581@fieldses.org> <478F9946.9010601@redhat.com> <20080117202342.GA6416@fieldses.org> <20080124160030.GB26164@fieldses.org> <73E1F599-3281-4B3B-8372-1E91C21C8E24@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "J.Bruce Fields" , Neil Brown , NFS list , cluster-devel@redhat.com, Christoph Hellwig To: Felix Blyakher Return-path: In-Reply-To: <73E1F599-3281-4B3B-8372-1E91C21C8E24@sgi.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cluster-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: cluster-devel-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Felix Blyakher wrote: >> >> (I think Wendy's pretty close to that api already after adding the >> second method to start grace?) For reclaiming grace period issues, maybe we should move to https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2008-January/msg00340.html thread ? I view this (unlock) patch set is mostly done and really don't want to add more complications to it. -- Wendy