From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: Understanding iostat-ms output Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:19:52 -0500 Message-ID: <1200683992.13348.4.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> References: <2a29d0a3c209d9488b0a3e8263c53e38@swip.net> <1200675753.7781.32.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <6FBCD100-A02A-4CA5-8329-A801846B14BC@oracle.com> <1200679596.7781.37.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <004A35A1-29F1-4C3E-AD1A-B42EEF5B8C22@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org list" To: Chuck Lever Return-path: Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.10.15]:33489 "EHLO pat.uio.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757942AbYARTT4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:19:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <004A35A1-29F1-4C3E-AD1A-B42EEF5B8C22@oracle.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 13:11 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: > The plan is to include these scripts in nfs-utils during 2CQ08, after > the IPv6 work is complete. There is some additional work to be done, > such as composing man pages for both scripts, adding appropriate > dependency information in the nfs-utils build scripts, and so on. I'm of two minds about that. I agree that we need an iostat-like utility in nfs-utils, but I'm wary about also adding in a new language dependency on python.