From: Risto Bell Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] NFS: Add NFS_MOUNT_NONEGDE flag to avoid caching negative dentries Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:12:37 -0800 Message-ID: <478E7345.8080003@cypress.com> References: <20080115163013.GC18911@newbie.thebellsplace.net> <1200415972.7702.7.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20080116012209.GB26010@newbie.thebellsplace.net> <1200451350.28088.43.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <478DFD5A.1040501@RedHat.com> <01AE8AF878612047A442668306EAEB05018178E7@SACEXMV01.hq.netapp.com> <1200516219.6932.22.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed To: NFS list Return-path: Received: from ns1.cypress.com ([157.95.67.4]:62247 "EHLO ns1.cypress.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751001AbYAPVh3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:37:29 -0500 Received: from corpmail.cypress.com (corpmail [157.95.1.2]) by ns1.cypress.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m0GL8JOJ008153 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:08:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from meson.design.cypress.com (meson.design.cypress.com [172.17.2.36]) by corpmail.cypress.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m0GLCcnm007321 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:12:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mopar.design.cypress.com (mopar [172.17.14.88]) by meson.design.cypress.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA01311 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:12:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mopar.design.cypress.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mopar.design.cypress.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0GLCb6e004232 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:12:37 -0800 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Already decided not to go the distance, with separate controls of time-to-live of positive and negative lookup cache entries (or is it not considered good form to overload negttl=0 as means to disable)?