From: Wendy Cheng Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] NLM failover unlock commands Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:17:08 -0500 Message-ID: <478F7F84.4040909@redhat.com> References: <4783E3C9.3040803@redhat.com> <20080109180214.GA31071@infradead.org> <20080110075959.GA9623@infradead.org> <4788665B.4020405@redhat.com> <18315.62909.330258.83038@notabene.brown> <478D14C5.1000804@redhat.com> <18317.7319.443532.62244@notabene.brown> <478D3820.9080402@redhat.com> <20080117151007.GB16581@fieldses.org> <478F78E8.40601@redhat.com> <20080117161415.GE16581@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: Neil Brown , Christoph Hellwig , NFS list , cluster-devel@redhat.com To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080117161415.GE16581@fieldses.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cluster-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: cluster-devel-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: J. Bruce Fields wrote: > Yeah, sounds good. Maybe under Documentation/filesystems? And it might > also be helpful to leave a reference to it in the code, e.g., in > nfsctl.c: > > /* > * The following are used for failover; see > * Documentation/filesystems/nfsd-failover.txt for details. > */ > > --b. > ok, looks good ... but let's "fix" this on the resume patch ? or you want it on the unlock patch *now* ? -- Wendy