From: =?UTF-8?Q?Peter_=C3=85strand?= Subject: Re: A new NFSv4 server... Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 20:57:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <200801041528.KAA18776@snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca> <20080104172142.GD17112@fieldses.org> <477E8E1C.9090205@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="789237761-1463249351-1199476653=:18738" Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org To: Jeff Garzik Return-path: Received: from mail.cendio.se ([193.12.253.69]:63006 "EHLO mail.cendio.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753304AbYADT5f (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2008 14:57:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <477E8E1C.9090205@garzik.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --789237761-1463249351-1199476653=:18738 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Ditto. I think it'd be great to have a variety of client and server > > implementations available over the net, but I've had no luck talking > > anybody else into it. >=20 > I think blanket public access wouldn't be as effective as passworded acce= ss to > a cluster, much like how people get accounts on kernel.org (which is an > excellent model for shared-interest services). >=20 > On the test cluster, I would want to be able to really stress my software= , > which to any normal firewall or casual observer would look like a DoS att= empt. I'm not afraid of stress-tests that looks like DoS attempts. What worries= =20 me is that a writable export will be used for sharing warez or something=20 like that.=20 Rgds,=20 --- Peter =C3=85strand=09=09ThinLinc Chief Developer Cendio AB=09=09http://www.cendio.se Wallenbergs gata 4 583 30 Link=C3=B6ping=09Phone: +46-13-21 46 00 --789237761-1463249351-1199476653=:18738--