From: Neil Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] SUNRPC: spin svc_rqst initialization to its own function Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:53:09 +1100 Message-ID: <18307.4037.415675.519239@notabene.brown> References: <1199534542-3384-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> <1199534542-3384-2-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Layton Return-path: Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:37946 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754247AbYAHFxT (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 00:53:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: message from Jeff Layton on Saturday January 5 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Saturday January 5, jlayton@redhat.com wrote: > Move the initialzation in __svc_create_thread that happens prior to > thread creation to a new function. Export the function to allow > services to have better control over the svc_rqst structs. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton > --- > include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h | 2 ++ > net/sunrpc/svc.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h > index 8531a70..5f07300 100644 > --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h > +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h > @@ -382,6 +382,8 @@ struct svc_procedure { > */ > struct svc_serv * svc_create(struct svc_program *, unsigned int, > void (*shutdown)(struct svc_serv*)); > +struct svc_rqst *svc_prepare_thread(struct svc_serv *serv, > + struct svc_pool *pool); > int svc_create_thread(svc_thread_fn, struct svc_serv *); > void svc_exit_thread(struct svc_rqst *); > struct svc_serv * svc_create_pooled(struct svc_program *, unsigned int, > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c > index fca17d0..b29ed43 100644 > --- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c > +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c > @@ -538,23 +538,14 @@ svc_release_buffer(struct svc_rqst *rqstp) > put_page(rqstp->rq_pages[i]); > } > > -/* > - * Create a thread in the given pool. Caller must hold BKL. > - * On a NUMA or SMP machine, with a multi-pool serv, the thread > - * will be restricted to run on the cpus belonging to the pool. > - */ > -static int > -__svc_create_thread(svc_thread_fn func, struct svc_serv *serv, > - struct svc_pool *pool) > +struct svc_rqst * > +svc_prepare_thread(struct svc_serv *serv, struct svc_pool *pool) > { > struct svc_rqst *rqstp; > - int error = -ENOMEM; > - int have_oldmask = 0; > - cpumask_t oldmask; > > rqstp = kzalloc(sizeof(*rqstp), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!rqstp) > - goto out; > + goto out_enomem; > > init_waitqueue_head(&rqstp->rq_wait); > > @@ -570,6 +561,34 @@ __svc_create_thread(svc_thread_fn func, struct svc_serv *serv, > spin_unlock_bh(&pool->sp_lock); > rqstp->rq_server = serv; > rqstp->rq_pool = pool; > + return rqstp; > + > +out_thread: > + svc_exit_thread(rqstp); I realise that the bug existed before your change, but calling svc_exit_thread at this point is not good. The 'goto out_thread' is *before* "pool->sp_nrthreads++", but svc_exit_thread does "pool->sp_nrthreads--;". Not good. As you are playing is this code, do you feel like fixing that error path?? Otherwise, patch looks good. Acked-By: NeilBrown Thanks, NeilBrown