From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Subject: Re: A new NFSv4 server...
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:32:00 -0500
Message-ID: <20080103163200.GB30029@fieldses.org>
References: <477CD231.30603@garzik.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Return-path: <nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org>
In-Reply-To: <477CD231.30603@garzik.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>,
	<mailto:nfsv4-request@linux-nfs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://linux-nfs.org/pipermail/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@linux-nfs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@linux-nfs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>,
	<mailto:nfsv4-request@linux-nfs.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org
Errors-To: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org
List-ID: <linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 07:16:49AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> At this point, I'm quite interested to hear feedback on how the server 
> works with other NFSv4 clients.

Any possibility of making Connectathon in May?:

	http://www.connectathon.org/

The major NFSv4 implementors normally have their clients there, so it's
usually the quickest way to find and solve any interoperability
problems.  Almost all the work will probably be on sessions and pNFS,
but people should be willing to do basic 4.0 testing too.

Glad to hear you're still working on this--it sounds interesting.

--b.