From: Chuck Lever Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] RFC: NFS-related fs/Kconfig updates Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:41:38 -0500 Message-ID: <68C5871E-9118-4E45-B206-FA5A4ECBEE2D@oracle.com> References: <20080205180726.32229.35186.stgit@manray.1015granger.net> <20080205203033.GK8210@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]:42758 "EHLO rgminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759006AbYBEUmu (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:42:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080205203033.GK8210@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Feb 5, 2008, at 3:30 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 01:08:28PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: >> Another pass at cleaning up the NFS and NFSD entries in fs/Kconfig. >> >> Comments / suggestions? > > "Another pass" isn't clearly a "please apply if there are no > objections", so I assume you're not done? "RFC:" in the Subject: means that this is only a "request for comments". When the patch set is ready, I will send it To: you and/or Trond instead of To: the mailing list, and finish the cover letter with "Please apply". > The help text changes and the change to remove the "ifdef TCP"'s at > least look fine to me. Thanks. I am also trying to find a way to get the kbuild folks to have a look at this. -- Chuck Lever chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com