From: "Talpey, Thomas" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] silence-call-timeout-printk Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:57:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1206643752-11132-1-git-send-email-aglo@umich.edu> <20080327195445.GI32540@fieldses.org> <1206648229.15396.2.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20080327202331.GJ32540@fieldses.org> <20080327205311.GL32540@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: "Talpey, Thomas" , Olga Kornievskaia , Trond Myklebust , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37]:36151 "EHLO mx2.netapp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753680AbYC1P5W (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:57:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080327205311.GL32540@fieldses.org> References: <1206643752-11132-1-git-send-email-aglo@umich.edu> <20080327195445.GI32540@fieldses.org> <1206648229.15396.2.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org> <20080327202331.GJ32540@fieldses.org> <20080327205311.GL32540@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: At 04:53 PM 3/27/2008, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > (It's pretty easy for callbacks to >fail, especially the initial probe of the callback channel. I don't >want to spam the server's logs about that.) Agree. The approach sounds good. Besides, the 4.1 session will often avoid the whole situation, by sharing the channel. Tom.