From: "Kevin Coffman" Subject: Re: Version check in aclocal/kerberos.m5 Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:38:34 -0400 Message-ID: <4d569c330803310638vec97b65u6d63080bc8df8f55@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080330103159.GA4003@uio.no> <4d569c330803310615n1eb6e911o1e09c3df2ee5a7e2@mail.gmail.com> <20080331132926.GA10294@uio.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: "Steinar H. Gunderson" Return-path: Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.185]:60679 "EHLO ti-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750921AbYCaNii (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:38:38 -0400 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 28so372744tif.23 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 06:38:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080331132926.GA10294-6Z/AllhyZU4@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 09:15:37AM -0400, Kevin Coffman wrote: > > Hello Steinar, > > I'm not clear what you are looking to patch? > > > > It should be possible to improve the parsing in aclocal/kerberos5.m4 > > to handle this situation. Is that what you are looking for? > > Yes, that was my idea. > > My question was: Does this code actually originate in nfs-utils, or does it > come from somewhere else? AFAIK, I am the only one to blame. There are other versions of configure tests for K5, but none that try to use the version number...