From: "david m. richter" Subject: Re: nfs4_getfacl "Failed getxattr operation" when too many ACL entries exist Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:41:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <47FE8C68.50502@csupomona.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Brian De Wolf Return-path: Received: from citi.umich.edu ([141.211.133.111]:35411 "EHLO citi.umich.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751778AbYDJWlT (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:41:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, david m. richter wrote: > On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Brian De Wolf wrote: > > > Recently we've been prototyping serving Solaris ZFS exports via NFSv4 to some > > Linux hosts. These will some day be exposed to general users, so I've been > > testing things to see if I can break them. Anyway, it seems that nfs4_getfacl > > is only able to read ACLs with up to 208 entries. nfs4_setfacl is able to > > insert a 209th entry, but any attempts to view or edit the ACLs after that > > fail with: > > > > Failed getxattr operation > > : Input/output error > > > > There are two ways to make the ACLs readable again: > > 1) Have someone log in to the Solaris box and remove some of the entries > > 2) Reset the ACLs using nfs4_setfacl -s `some spec` > > > > Has anyone run into this issue before? Is it fixable? I didn't reach the > > same problem locally on the Solaris box, nor on another Solaris box with the > > same NFS mount, so it looks like it's a problem specific to Linux. Here's the > > versions of relevant packages on the test box running Gentoo (did I miss > > any?): > > Kernel: 2.6.23-gentoo-r8 > > nfs-utils-1.1.0-r1 > > attr-2.4.39 > > nfs4-acl-tools-0.3.2 > > honestly, this probably stems from some naive, unrevisited > assumptions still lingering nfs4-acl-tools code that need fixing. at the > -very- least, nfs4_setfacl could save the original ACL and attempt to > restore it if the setxattr() call fails. sorry, misread part of your letter the first time around -- it'd be very bizarre if nfs4_getfacl influenced the ACL in any way, so i suspect that something's going awry with nfs4_setfacl. seeing such an arbitrary limit of 208 or 209 ACEs looks like the tools being dumb. d . > it's possible this case involves the server, but i suspect the > tools. i'll look at this tomorrow and get back to you. > > > d > . > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >