From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: NFS3+KRB5 question Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 14:00:51 -0400 Message-ID: <20080407180051.GE3305@fieldses.org> References: <35b652ed9c3ac37ca9dc102b1bb65a83@localhost> <20080401123643.GA18475@goelette.ens.fr> <20080401205629.GC21343@fieldses.org> <2A8F26C5-13E7-47F0-AC04-33820FF9377A@it-loops.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Guntsche Michael Return-path: Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:38210 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751097AbYDGSAw (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Apr 2008 14:00:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <2A8F26C5-13E7-47F0-AC04-33820FF9377A-Z92qn3yYq0hWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 10:43:22PM +0200, Guntsche Michael wrote: > > On Apr 1, 2008, at 22:56, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> The client here is within its rights, and the server is wrong; see: >> >> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2623.txt >> >> (especially 2.3.2, "NFS Procedures Used at Mount Time"). The kernel >> changes on the server side should not be too difficult after the >> export >> changes we made a few versions ago. > > Hi, > > Thanks for the info, is it planned to change the server part in the near > future, or is this a low priority task, just curious. It's on my todo list, but I don't know when I'm going to get to it. --b.