From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] svcrdma: WR context management bug fixes and cleanup Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 15:26:22 -0700 Message-ID: References: <12120836962076-git-send-email-tom@opengridcomputing.com> <20080529221000.GE24018@fieldses.org> <1212099937.22478.3.camel@trinity.ogc.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, swise@opengridcomputing.com To: Tom Tucker Return-path: Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]:6389 "EHLO sj-iport-4.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755610AbYE2Wfh (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 18:35:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1212099937.22478.3.camel-SMNkleLxa3ZimH42XvhXlA@public.gmane.org> (Tom Tucker's message of "Thu, 29 May 2008 17:25:37 -0500") Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > I'm inclined to say "no". But I'd like to hear if anyone out there is > dead in the water due to a bug in the 2.6.26 version. To be honest I haven't had a chance to do much NFS/RDMA testing with the current 2.6.26 tree. But last I looked there were no major regressions at least (still open issues I think, but definitely better than 2.6.25)