From: "Talpey, Thomas" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] NFS: Update help text for CONFIG_NFS_FS Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 14:10:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20080518021241.8366.12464.stgit@ellison.1015granger.net> <20080518021614.8366.39102.stgit@ellison.1015granger.net> <64E73AAD-3E2E-4C57-B51F-6D060B6890E8@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Chuck Lever Return-path: Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37]:10000 "EHLO mx2.netapp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763140AbYESSKy (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 14:10:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <64E73AAD-3E2E-4C57-B51F-6D060B6890E8@oracle.com> References: <20080518021241.8366.12464.stgit-ewv44WTpT0t9HhUboXbp9zCvJB+x5qRC@public.gmane.org> <20080518021614.8366.39102.stgit-ewv44WTpT0t9HhUboXbp9zCvJB+x5qRC@public.gmane.org> <64E73AAD-3E2E-4C57-B51F-6D060B6890E8@oracle.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: At 01:21 PM 5/19/2008, Chuck Lever wrote: >I think that's why this patch was originally rejected. Trond didn't >like the fact that I said IETF standard, but I don't recall the exact >details. Ok, I guess I'm with you, but don't have a strong issue with it. Again, I'm mainly just glad the NFS_FS option doesn't say to use CODA instead. EXPERIMENTAL and Sun's protocol - at least it's moving up in the pecking order. :-) Tom.