From: "Adam Olsen" Subject: Re: NFS+GD issues on kernel 2.6.24, but not 2.6.22 Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 14:06:26 -0600 Message-ID: <2473b43f0805151306jf010782tc411077392a91354@mail.gmail.com> References: <2473b43f0805150706g5be9918cu3c77d9135cded912@mail.gmail.com> <20080515084610.4e5161bc@tupile.poochiereds.net> <2473b43f0805150855o59a14e34h82b20f847c53f392@mail.gmail.com> <1210876652.17301.3.camel@localhost> <2473b43f0805151300q19d23bddy612e1978864669de@mail.gmail.com> <1210881883.7796.3.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "Jeff Layton" , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: "Trond Myklebust" Return-path: Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.228]:25562 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755433AbYEOUGa (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2008 16:06:30 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c48so302612wra.1 for ; Thu, 15 May 2008 13:06:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1210881883.7796.3.camel@localhost> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: > Some applications (e.g. backup apps) may gripe at the fact that the > inode numbers are no longer guaranteed to be unique, but the only > alternative solution to that would be to convert your apps to be 64-bit > safe. In general, it would be ok though? -- Adam Olsen SendOutCards.com http://www.vimtips.org http://last.fm/user/synic