From: "Janne Karhunen" Subject: Re: [patch] fix statd -n Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 12:14:22 -0400 Message-ID: <24c1515f0805050914s6320bebei78be3cae4a8278e0@mail.gmail.com> References: <24c1515f0805010628k6b57598btb27116c719b99fad@mail.gmail.com> <24c1515f0805021724q7dfe5294r702a9c8ffde01129@mail.gmail.com> <20080505144538.GB8259@fieldses.org> <481F20B6.8080603@gmail.com> <24c1515f0805050801m66cce68k94073914ba26511e@mail.gmail.com> <481F2600.20501@gmail.com> <24c1515f0805050823s14f4caf7s3a4ff06a70c220be@mail.gmail.com> <20080505152519.GE8259@fieldses.org> <24c1515f0805050828o3aa5b33aod2a6e4e0b5b6c9dc@mail.gmail.com> <481F2F00.8000303@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , "Peter Staubach" , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: "Wendy Cheng" Return-path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.177]:24202 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754148AbYEEQOX (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2008 12:14:23 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j37so778582waf.23 for ; Mon, 05 May 2008 09:14:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <481F2F00.8000303@gmail.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Wendy Cheng wrote: > > > > As statd runs this directly and reads name for -v from > > > > MY_NAME, > > > > > > Nope; see the -L option to statd. > > > > > > > So the let the user worry approach. Statd does not > > notify anyone and user is supposed to do it with > > sm-notify manually. This will work, but -n looks > > cleaner me.. > > Or we can do this ... > If user specified "statd -n", we run "sm-notify -v" command for them ? So > we don't need to fork the code but also keep someone happy ? Ok, so -n remains.. > Give me one day to see whether it is doable ? Given above 1.1.* probably works already, but it does not address the ANY bind - but do you even wish that to be addressed? -- // Janne