From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [NFS] NFS performance debugging Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:12:36 -0400 Message-ID: <1214590356.9235.1.camel@localhost> References: <48624F34.1070108@RedHat.com> <76bd70e30806270644j3e67c83and7b1f7fd6cc2f5f5@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Krishna Kumar2 , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Steve Dickson To: chucklever@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from neil.brown.name ([220.233.11.133]:34567 "EHLO neil.brown.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756214AbYF0SMu (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:12:50 -0400 Received: from brown by neil.brown.name with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KCIRE-0003Fo-Nl for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 04:12:48 +1000 In-Reply-To: <76bd70e30806270644j3e67c83and7b1f7fd6cc2f5f5-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 09:44 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > > > > (KK: for some reason, the real NFS mount gives all zero. Also, for > > loopback, the read/write > > BW is very poor: less than 40 Kb/s). > > As an aside, Jim Rees pointed out to me that that should be KB/s, not > Kb/s. I will post a patch to address that. Strictly speaking, neither of the above are correct: the SI abbreviation for kilo is 'k'. IOW it should be 'kB/s' Cheers Trond ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs _______________________________________________ Please note that nfs@lists.sourceforge.net is being discontinued. Please subscribe to linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org instead. http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-nfs