From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [NFS] NFS performance debugging Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:03:42 -0400 Message-ID: <20080626170342.GB6961@fieldses.org> References: <200806231659.58158@fortytwo.ch> <200806250902.42880@fortytwo.ch> <20080625165658.GA12629@fieldses.org> <200806260819.35108@fortytwo.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net To: Adrian von Bidder Return-path: Received: from neil.brown.name ([220.233.11.133]:33139 "EHLO neil.brown.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752001AbYFZRlr (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:41:47 -0400 Received: from brown by neil.brown.name with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KBusz-0001T1-GR for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 03:03:53 +1000 In-Reply-To: <200806260819.35108-xzBkAS4TQxQfv37vnLkPlQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:19:29AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > On Wednesday 25 June 2008 18.56:58 J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 09:02:42AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > > > First tries showed > > > * There are no acl on my files now > > > > NFSv4 uses an entirely different type of ACL, for which you need > > different client-side tools; see > > I'm absolutely confused on the state of nfs4 acls. There are so many old > mailing list posts around that it's difficult to see what information > applies to the currentimplementation. So: are POSIX acls in the server > filesystem somehow mapped to nfsv4 acls on the client side? I understand > there understands an RFC proposal on how to do this, and > http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/ACLs is very interesting but > doesn't really cover the current state of the implementation. I've attempted to update that wiki page to fix that problem; could you take a look and tell me whether the changes help? > > http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/linux/nfs4-acl-tools/ > > Hmm. Not packaged in Debian yet?????? ;-) So work to do for me if I end up > using nfs4 Yes. Volunteers to package those things welcomed.... (Or maybe we should get them into nfs-utils at some point. I don't know.) --b. > > > * user id mapping seems funny: some users map to nobody, others map > > > correctly. Huh? > > > > And whereas v2/v3 require only uid's and gid's to agree, v4 (if you're > > using auth_sys) requires uid's, gid's, *and* user and group names to > > agree. > > I got that fixed. "localdomain" in idmapd.conf... > > cheers > -- vbi > > > -- > > Maybe that question would be a good starting point: What's the use for > > a gender field there? > Stalking. > -- Miriam Ruiz, Marco d'Itri (im that order) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs _______________________________________________ Please note that nfs@lists.sourceforge.net is being discontinued. Please subscribe to linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org instead. http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-nfs