From: Jeff Layton Subject: [PATCH] NFS: missing nfs_fattr_init in nfs3_proc_getacl and nfs3_proc_setacls Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:49:59 -0400 Message-ID: <1216554599-6547-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:36728 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752626AbYGTLuR (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:50:17 -0400 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: The fattrs used in the NFSv3 getacl/setacl calls are not being properly initialized. Thanks to Cai Qian for noticing the strange nfs_debug messages. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c b/fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c index 423842f..cef6255 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ struct posix_acl *nfs3_proc_getacl(struct inode *inode, int type) dprintk("NFS call getacl\n"); msg.rpc_proc = &server->client_acl->cl_procinfo[ACLPROC3_GETACL]; + nfs_fattr_init(&fattr); status = rpc_call_sync(server->client_acl, &msg, 0); dprintk("NFS reply getacl: %d\n", status); @@ -322,6 +323,7 @@ static int nfs3_proc_setacls(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl, dprintk("NFS call setacl\n"); msg.rpc_proc = &server->client_acl->cl_procinfo[ACLPROC3_SETACL]; + nfs_fattr_init(&fattr); status = rpc_call_sync(server->client_acl, &msg, 0); nfs_access_zap_cache(inode); nfs_zap_acl_cache(inode); -- 1.5.5.1