From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: Massive NFS problems on large cluster with large number of mounts Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 17:08:35 -0400 Message-ID: <20080702210835.GC24850@fieldses.org> References: <4869E8AB.4060905@aei.mpg.de> <20080701182250.GB21807@fieldses.org> <486B89F5.9000109@aei.mpg.de> <20080702203130.GA24850@fieldses.org> <1215032676.7087.30.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Carsten Aulbert , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Henning Fehrmann , Steffen Grunewald To: Trond Myklebust Return-path: Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:36371 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753190AbYGBVJC (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2008 17:09:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1215032676.7087.30.camel@localhost> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 05:04:36PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 16:31 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 04:00:21PM +0200, Carsten Aulbert wrote: > > > Any hint for us how we shall proceed and maybe force the clients to also > > > use ports > 1023? I think that would solve our problems. > > > > I think the below (untested) would tell the client to stop demanding a > > privileged port. > > Alternatively, just change the values of /proc/sys/sunrpc/min_resvport > and /proc/sys/sunrpc/max_resvport to whatever range of ports you > actually want to use. Whoops, yes, I missed those, thanks. --b.