From: Chuck Lever Subject: Re: inux-next: Tree for July 1 Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:49:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20080702011434.6fb403d5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <200807012236.19400.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Trond Myklebust To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Return-path: Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:28413 "EHLO agminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754348AbYGAUuj (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:50:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200807012236.19400.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Jul 1, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, 1 of July 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since next-20080630: >> >> New tree: ttydev - unfortunately it had to be reverted because of >> build >> failures after lots of conflict resolution (which may have caused the >> build failures). >> >> Changed tree: the cris tree changed branch names. >> >> The sched tree gained a couple of conflicts against the ftrace and >> cpus4096 trees. >> >> The pci tree gained a conflict against the x86 tree. >> >> The usb tree reverted due to a build failure after merging with the >> pci >> tree was changed for a fixup patch. >> >> The v4l-dvb tree lost its three conflicts against Linus' tree. >> >> The s390 tree gained a conflict against the diver-core tree. >> >> The ide tree fixed its build problems. >> >> The nfsd tree lost a conflict against the nfs tree. >> >> The powerpc tree gained a conflict against the ide tree. >> >> The net tree gained two conflicts against the powerpc tree. >> >> The galak tree lost its conflict against the net tree. >> >> the blk-removal tree gained a conflict against the s390 tree. >> >> The firmware tree lost several conflicts against the net tree so >> didn't >> need a commit reverted any more. >> >> Merging the ttydev tree got several conflicts against the usb and >> firmware trees. Unfortunately, it also would not build and so was >> reverted. >> >> I have also applied the following patches for know problems: >> module: fix NULL pointer dereference in find_symbol() > > I can't mount NFS shares with this kernel. I get something of this > sort in > dmesg and it seems to be 100% reproducible: > > [ 314.058858] RPC: Registered udp transport module. > [ 314.058863] RPC: Registered tcp transport module. > [ 314.490970] RPC: transport (0) not supported > [ 319.246987] __ratelimit: 23 messages suppressed > > linux-next from yesterday was fine with the same .config . What's your mount command line? -- Chuck Lever chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com