From: "Chuck Lever" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] SUNRPC: Set V6ONLY socket option for RPC listener sockets Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:20:53 -0400 Message-ID: <76bd70e30808210920y3db1b07cyccbe40e1b4582c12@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080813223653.13068.9467.stgit@manray.1015granger.net> <20080813223953.13068.97829.stgit@manray.1015granger.net> <20080814200554.GI23859@fieldses.org> <74E488BD-DB15-41CD-AD30-A8A5213BC140@oracle.com> <20080814203833.GK23859@fieldses.org> <20080820193126.GB21226@fieldses.org> <48AD5B85.4020807@bull.net> <20080821144117.GB22587@fieldses.org> <48AD8A72.2040200@bull.net> Reply-To: chucklever@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , trond.myklebust@netapp.com, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, "Frank S Filz" To: aime.le-rouzic@bull.net Return-path: Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.29]:60991 "EHLO yx-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752003AbYHUQUz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:20:55 -0400 Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so31617yxm.1 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:20:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <48AD8A72.2040200@bull.net> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Le Rouzic w= rote: > J. Bruce Fields a =E9crit : > >>> J. Bruce Fields a =E9crit : >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> so suppose I'm a server >>>>>> administrator, and want my nfs server to listen for ipv6 connect= ions. >>>>>> Will there be some switch I'll need to flip? >>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 04:45:31PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I don't know how that UI will be designed. So far, I've focused = only >>>>> on the pieces needed for client side IPv6 support. I figured the= Bull team >>>>> had something figured out for the server, and didn't think any mo= re about >>>>> it. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I've forgotten who was working on that; Aurelien Charbon? >>>> >> >> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 02:11:49PM +0200, Le Rouzic wrote: >> >>> >>> Sorry for not answering before, I am back from vacation. Aurelien = is >>> no longer directly working on that even he can answer any question= s. >>> It is me now who tess NFSV4 IPV6 with the patches Aurelien delivere= d >>> to Bruce a few months ago. But since Chuck has delivered several n= ew >>> patches which affect the NFS server side about the way nfsd can lis= ten >>> for ipv6 connections. >>> >> >> I merged the last patch I can remember from Aurelien (f15364bd "IPv6 >> support for NFS server export caches"). Are there some others float= ing >> around that I should look at? >> >> >>> >>> To have NFSV4 IPV6 working with those changes, what it would be nic= e >>> to have a complete list on what are the changes. Is there now a >>> complete release for which we can test those latest changes? If no= t >>> which one will be? Are there any other changes still planned? >>> >> >> I was hoping you or Chuck would know; I don't know of anyone else >> working on nfs over ipv6. >> > > Hi, > About changes I was talking about changes introduced for IPv6 RPC ser= vices > via rpcbind > at least thoses published on the 19th on this mailing list can be con= sidered > like the last ones. My complete IPv6 patch set is available here: http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=3Dcel/cel-2.6.git;a=3Dsummary The tags that start "cel-ipv6-..." contain the IPv6-related patches. I see the latest one is still two weeks old, so I should update it with what I sent to Bruce recently. --=20 Chuck Lever