From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] lockd: Add address family-agnostic helper for zeroing the port number Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:17:50 -0400 Message-ID: <20080826191750.GH4380@fieldses.org> References: <20080822163939.20488.92983.stgit@manray.1015granger.net> <20080822164232.20488.11685.stgit@manray.1015granger.net> <20080826190319.GF4380@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: trond.myklebust@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Chuck Lever Return-path: Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:60923 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753661AbYHZTSB (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:18:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080826190319.GF4380@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 03:03:19PM -0400, bfields wrote: > It would be nice if not necessary just to move nfs_set_port() somewhere > common and use that (maybe with a more generic name). > > That aside, all 5 patches are OK by me. Provisionally applied all but the first (purely client-side) patch to git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git for-2.6.28 Do you have any good regression tests for nsm? --b.