From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH] NLM: Revert parts of commit 24e36663 Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:51:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20080926185140.GB1492@fieldses.org> References: <20080924184732.4078.83334.stgit@tarkus.1015granger.net> <20080925213831.GF14349@fieldses.org> <20080926184554.GA1492@fieldses.org> <1222454975.10150.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Chuck Lever , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Trond Myklebust Return-path: Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:45229 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752227AbYIZSvm (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:51:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1222454975.10150.8.camel@localhost> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 02:49:35PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 14:45 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > If so, we could post it after > > > the merge window closes. It would give a little more time to do some > > > testing. > > > > That sound suspiciously like "since this is a high priority, it will be > > accepted later, so we can make it a lower priority." Help! > > > > But anyway, yes, we might have more time. > > At the Kernel Summit Linus said he wants this kind of fix to go into the > merge window rather than in the -rc series if possible. His position was > that he'd rather revert a bad fix instead of delaying the testing in the > mainline kernel... Makes sense to me. --b.