From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: NFS regression? Odd delays and lockups accessing an NFS export. Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:54:15 -0400 Message-ID: <20080927035415.GC12765@fieldses.org> References: <1221544139.2534.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <48CF9AC3.6060801@opengridcomputing.com> <1221577412.28572.60.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <48CFD7C3.5080207@opengridcomputing.com> <1221582285.28572.67.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1222156770.6869.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1222169589.6869.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080923170344.GC2700@fieldses.org> <1222443426.3949.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1222453053.3949.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Tom Tucker , Trond Myklebust , Grant Coady , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, neilb@suse.de, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Ian Campbell Return-path: Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:45864 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751138AbYI0Dy3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:54:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1222453053.3949.21.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 07:17:33PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 16:37 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > It's possible, the good case is naturally quite hard to establish with > > 100% certainty. I declared v2.6.26 OK after an uptime of 4 days and 19 > > hours, compared with failure normally within 1-2 days. It's possible I > > was premature in doing so. I'll run 2e96d2867 for at least a full week > > before reporting back. > > Or it'll reproduce after just a few hours :-/ > > Looks like a false negative on v2.6.26 -- I'll retest from there. OK, so apologies, but this has been a long thread, and maybe we could use a summary of the symptoms and the results so far. I think you said 2.6.24 or .25 was the last you're *positive* was good? --b.