From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: Full IPv6 client and server support (kernel and user commands) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:07:45 -0400 Message-ID: <20080924220745.GH10841@fieldses.org> References: <48D39CDE.1040600@bull.net> <20080924165108.GC5772@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Linux NFS Mailing list , nfsv4 To: Le Rouzic Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080924165108.GC5772@fieldses.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org Errors-To: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:51:08PM -0400, bfields wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 02:36:46PM +0200, Le Rouzic wrote: > > I have just posted at http://nfsv4.bullopensource.org/ a full IPV6 > > client and server NFSV4 support > > based on linux-2.6.27-rc3 and nfs-utils.1.1.2. > > It is experimental and not fully tested but it allows to have a IPV6 > > NFSV4 linux configuration to > > play with. > > > > Let me know if any issues to get this delivery and to run it. > > I took a quick look at the server patch available from the URL above. > > There are more #if's than necessary--for example, maybe you could define > a constant once in a header to choose the correct address family rather > than putting #if's around all the svc_create() calls? > > It'd be worth running this by Chuck, as he's been doing a good job of > that kind of thing. > > Could you mail future versions of any patches to the mailing list in the > usual format, rather than providing a URL? That'd save us a little > time. (Whoops, sorry, I see now that you did and it got lost in the pile of mail that I arrived while I was travelling.... Anyway, the ifdef comments still apply.) --b.