From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] RPC/RDMA: check selected memory registration mode at runtime. Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:40:02 -0400 Message-ID: <1223487603.7361.24.camel@localhost> References: <20081008154506.1336.59892.stgit@tmt3.nane.netapp.com> <20081008154723.1336.57976.stgit@tmt3.nane.netapp.com> <1223486569.7361.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: "Talpey, Thomas" Return-path: Received: from mail-out1.uio.no ([129.240.10.57]:50354 "EHLO mail-out1.uio.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754572AbYJHRkG (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:40:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 13:29 -0400, Talpey, Thomas wrote: > At 01:22 PM 10/8/2008, Trond Myklebust wrote: > >On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 11:47 -0400, Tom Talpey wrote: > >> At transport creation, check for, and use, any local dma lkey. > >> Then, check that the selected memory registration mode is in fact > >> supported by the RDMA adapter selected for the mount. Fall back > >> to best alternative if not. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tom Talpey > >> Signed-off-by: Tom Tucker > > > >I'm confused... Who is signing off on what? AFAICS, Tom Talpey is the > >author and is the one sending this patch series. Where does Tom Tucker > >come into the picture? > > Tom Tucker wrote the initial version of some of the FRMR series, he > had emailed them to linux-nfs a while back. I left his sign-off in place > on those, as a co-author, and then signed for my own contributions. Hmm... Tricky... I'd do something along the lines of Signed-off-by: Tom Tucker [Heavily rewritten by Tom Talpey ] Signed-off-by: Tom Talpey Maybe with an extra description of why you rewrote stuff in between the square brackets.