From: Le Rouzic Subject: Re: NFS mount over IPv6 success Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:05:13 +0100 Message-ID: <491AFEB9.1090208@bull.net> References: <20081109164132.GA19615@uio.no> <20081112133553.GA32294@uio.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: Chuck Lever , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: "Steinar H. Gunderson" Return-path: Received: from ecfrec.frec.bull.fr ([129.183.4.8]:57863 "EHLO ecfrec.frec.bull.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752898AbYKLQGf (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:06:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081112133553.GA32294-6Z/AllhyZU4@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Steinar H. Gunderson a =C3=A9crit : >On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:00:27AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: > =20 > >>Keep an eye out for IPv6-related patches for nfs-utils. The key is t= o =20 >>ensure IPv4 continues to work, especially on Debian which tracks =20 >>upstream nfs-utils closely. >> =20 >> > >We don't plan to incorporate IPv6-specific patches before upstream doe= s (and >lenny, our upcoming release, is not going to get libtirpc or rpcbind).= When >upstream nfs-utils is ready, you can expect us to configure with >--enable-ipv6 pretty quickly, though :-) > >I still haven't had any success with nfsd on the server side in Linux;= it's a >bit unclear to me what nfs-utils to use in particular. > >/* Steinar */ > =20 > Hi, There is a prototype nfs-utils package based on nfs-utils-1.1.2 you ca= n=20 play with at http://nfsv4.bullopensource.org/ Regards --=20 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Company : Bull, Architect of an Open World TM (www.bull.com) Name : Aime Le Rouzic=20 Mail : Bull - BP 208 - 38432 Echirolles Cedex - France E-Mail : aime.le-rouzic@bull.net Phone : 33 (4) 76.29.75.51 =46ax : 33 (4) 76.29.75.18 -----------------------------------------------------------------=20