From: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [GIT PULL -tip] fix 33 make headers_check warnings Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:21:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20090123162153.GA25766@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <1232223441.3966.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1232228261.27094.0.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <20090117221932.GA4956@uranus.ravnborg.org> <49725B1E.604@kernel.org> <1232498319.3123.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1232726359.3504.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1232726658.3504.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput , "H. Peter Anvin" , David Woodhouse , Ingo Molnar , x86 maintainers , urs.thuermann-l29pVbxQd1IUtdQbppsyvg@public.gmane.org, oliver.hartkopp-l29pVbxQd1IUtdQbppsyvg@public.gmane.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@vger.kernel.org, bfields@fieldses.org, neilb@suse.de, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, tiwai@suse.de, mchehab@infradead.org, LKML , Andrew Morton To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.235]:37159 "EHLO pfepa.post.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757067AbZAWQUO (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:20:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 05:11:13PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Friday 2009-01-23 17:04, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > >> > diff --git a/include/linux/dvb/audio.h b/include/linux/dvb/audio.h > >> > index 89412e1..758a48c 100644 > >> > --- a/include/linux/dvb/audio.h > >> > +++ b/include/linux/dvb/audio.h > >> > @@ -24,9 +24,8 @@ > >> > #ifndef _DVBAUDIO_H_ > >> > #define _DVBAUDIO_H_ > >> > > >> > -#ifdef __KERNEL__ > >> > #include > >> > -#else > >> > +#ifndef __KERNEL__ > >> > #include > >> > #endif > >> > > >> > >> It seems one have objection for this. So I will again insert this in my > >> new patchset. > >> > > > >oops, s/seems one/seems no one ;-) > > I had an objection as previously stated -- namely that > should be included to remain friendly to C++0x > programs which should use instead. Forcing > stdint.h is therefore not nice. This is fully agreed. Jaswinder - can I ask you to do this change (remove of the stdint.h include) in a follow-up patch. It is two independent changes. You original patch is fine as is. Thanks, Sam