From: Greg Banks Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] NFS: trace points added to mounting path Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:21:17 +1100 Message-ID: <497A42DD.2010304@melbourne.sgi.com> References: <4970B451.4080201@RedHat.com> <5B2817A2-B0FF-4FB5-9244-9E13C55EF6B2@oracle.com> <497757D1.7090908@RedHat.com> <497792EA.5040405@melbourne.sgi.com> <49788E71.3000306@RedHat.com> <54F36870-93F0-4154-A5AE-C9F22CD37EE3@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Steve Dickson , Linux NFS Mailing list , Linux NFSv4 mailing list , SystemTAP To: Chuck Lever Return-path: Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.179.30]:56785 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756668AbZAWWWm (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:22:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54F36870-93F0-4154-A5AE-C9F22CD37EE3@oracle.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Chuck Lever wrote: > > The big picture though, is what do we need to do to make it easier to > troubleshoot and solve problems. That is a much bigger question than > how we report errors. Indeed. -- Greg Banks, P.Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group. the brightly coloured sporks of revolution. I don't speak for SGI.