From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds" Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:27:40 +0000 Message-ID: <1232612860.29604.57.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1227737539.31008.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1228090631.7112.11.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <1228169383.20370.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1228565812.10856.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1229279045.3721.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20081216175503.GG16388@fieldses.org> <1229452775.3721.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090107222115.GI965@fieldses.org> <20090108182003.GB17623@fieldses.org> <1231449753.21688.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090108212605.GG19312@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-uHRqfsyV6HZS9hIRcwKT" Cc: Trond Myklebust , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Max Kellermann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gcosta@redhat.com, Grant Coady , Tom Tucker To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.47]:14594 "EHLO mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750761AbZAVI1x (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:27:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090108212605.GG19312@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-uHRqfsyV6HZS9hIRcwKT Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 16:26 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >=20 > > > (Merged now, so testing mainline as of today should work too.) > >=20 > > The server isn't really a machine I want to test random kernels on, > is > > there some subset of those changesets which it would be useful for > me to > > pull back onto the 2.6.26 kernel I'm using to test? (I can most like > > manage the backporting myself). > >=20 > > These two look like the relevant ones to me but I'm not sure: > > 22945e4a1c7454c97f5d8aee1ef526c83fef3223 svc: Clean up deferred > requests on transport destruction > > 69b6ba3712b796a66595cfaf0a5ab4dfe1cf964a SUNRPC: Ensure the server > closes sockets in a timely fashion > >=20 > > I think 69b6 was in the set of three I tested previously and the > other > > two turned into 2294? >=20 > Yep, exactly.--b. The client machine now has an uptime of ten days without error after these two patches were applied to the server. Thanks everybody, Ian. --=20 Ian Campbell I used to think that the brain was the most wonderful organ in my body. Then I realized who was telling me this. -- Emo Phillips --=-uHRqfsyV6HZS9hIRcwKT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkl4LfwACgkQM0+0qS9rzVlkXwCgvpL+UOpmjrfNlYjQZOY4g6fn jYYAoIDboUhwTpo8mIocPrAyN8ONTlnl =4tQq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-uHRqfsyV6HZS9hIRcwKT--