From: Steve Dickson Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] NFS: trace points added to mounting path Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:07:43 -0500 Message-ID: <49786F9F.7030400@RedHat.com> References: <4970B451.4080201@RedHat.com> <5B2817A2-B0FF-4FB5-9244-9E13C55EF6B2@oracle.com> <497757D1.7090908@RedHat.com> <1232566140.7692.64.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <49777E4C.2020501@RedHat.com> <1232569427.7692.70.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Chuck Lever , Linux NFSv4 mailing list , Linux NFS Mailing list , SystemTAP To: Trond Myklebust Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1232569427.7692.70.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org List-ID: Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 14:58 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >> Do we want to trace points: >> 1) at all >> 2) for debugging >> 3) for performance >> 4) 2 and 3 >> >> Once we get the above nailed down then we can decide how to go... > > I think it might be a good idea to flesh out a bit what you mean by > "debugging" here. Since you mentioned it in conjunction with the two > words "administrators" and "scripts", I assume that you are not talking > about kernel code debugging? I'm talking debugging for both admins and kernel people... With trace points and systemtap you can do both. steved.