From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds" Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:46:04 +0000 Message-ID: <1231753564.27350.83.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> References: <1227737539.31008.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1228090631.7112.11.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <1228169383.20370.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1228565812.10856.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1229279045.3721.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20081216175503.GG16388@fieldses.org> <1229452775.3721.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090107222115.GI965@fieldses.org> <20090108182003.GB17623@fieldses.org> <1231449753.21688.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090108212605.GG19312@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Trond Myklebust , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Max Kellermann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gcosta@redhat.com, Grant Coady , Tom Tucker To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48]:43979 "EHLO mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751411AbZALJq0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:46:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090108212605.GG19312@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 16:26 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:22:33PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > These two look like the relevant ones to me but I'm not sure: > > 22945e4a1c7454c97f5d8aee1ef526c83fef3223 svc: Clean up deferred requests on transport destruction > > 69b6ba3712b796a66595cfaf0a5ab4dfe1cf964a SUNRPC: Ensure the server closes sockets in a timely fashion > > > > I think 69b6 was in the set of three I tested previously and the other > > two turned into 2294? > > Yep, exactly.--b. OK, I have patched my 2.6.26 kernel with these and it is now running. It'll be about a week before I can say with any certainty that the issue hasn't recurred. Ian. -- Ian Campbell Current Noise: Pitchshifter - Subject To Status Do I have a lifestyle yet?