From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] NFS: trace points added to mounting path Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:15:27 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4970B451.4080201@RedHat.com> <49711BDF.3010605@melbourne.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Steve Dickson , Linux NFSv4 mailing list , Linux NFS Mailing list , SystemTAP To: Greg Banks Return-path: Received: from blaine.gmane.org ([80.91.229.8]:56143 "EHLO hugh.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761763AbZAQQQB (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:16:01 -0500 Received: from public by hugh.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LODq2-0003fW-BD for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:15:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <49711BDF.3010605-cP1dWloDopni96+mSzHFpQC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org> (Greg Banks's message of "Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:44:31 +1100") Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Greg Banks writes: > I have a patch which changes the definition of the dprintk() macro > (but *not* dprintk() callsites) to allow enabling and disabling > individual dprintk() statements through a /proc/ interface. Would > you be interested in that? It would make more sense to me to turn dprintk's into trace_marks, then use http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/30/297 to control transmission of the data to ftrace. - FChE