From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] sunrpc: Use utsnamespaces Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:20:12 -0500 Message-ID: <1231287612.11487.1.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> References: <20090106011314.534653345@us.ibm.com> <20090106011314.961946803@us.ibm.com> <20090106200229.GA17031@us.ibm.com> <1231274682.20316.65.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20090106215831.GE18147@us.ibm.com> <1231283734.8041.6.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20090106233238.GD13785@fieldses.org> <1231284943.8041.8.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20090106235322.GE13785@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Matt Helsley , Linux Containers , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Chuck Lever , Linux Containers , Cedric Le Goater To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37]:50162 "EHLO mx2.netapp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751767AbZAGAU2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:20:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090106235322.GE13785@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 18:53 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > It seems like overkill, though. Does anyone actually care whether these > names are right? I very much doubt it. Particularly since the actual sockets used by the RPC client are always owned by the init namespace (they are established from a workqueue process), and so the source IP address will always be that of the init namespace. Trond -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com www.netapp.com