From: Matt Helsley Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] sunrpc: Use utsnamespaces Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:57:27 -0800 Message-ID: <1231289847.14345.243.camel@localhost> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Linux Containers , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , "J. Bruce Fields" , Chuck Lever , "Eric W. Biederman" , Linux Containers , Cedric Le Goater To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no Return-path: Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:33552 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753488AbZAGA5d (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:57:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 19:39 -0500, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no wrote: > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 16:08 -0800, Matt Helsley wrote: > > IMHO This seems more incorrect than trying to use a more proximal > namespace. > > You have yet to explain why. Yes, I know I have to explain why. If you would please have a little more patience you might see I have replied to your original request for an explanation -- I *just* sent it out. If I don't see it show up soon I'll resend it as a reply here. OK? Cheers, -Matt Helsley