From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] nfsd: Improve NFS server performance Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:04:27 -0500 Message-ID: <20090209210427.GJ13636@fieldses.org> References: <20081230104245.9409.30030.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090204231958.GB20917@fieldses.org> <20090205202401.GH9200@fieldses.org> <20090209190648.GA13636@fieldses.org> <01164826-9C05-41E0-A763-825A9C6E8CFF@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Krishna Kumar2 , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Chuck Lever Return-path: Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([141.211.133.115]:43622 "EHLO pickle.fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753237AbZBIVEX (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:04:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <01164826-9C05-41E0-A763-825A9C6E8CFF@oracle.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 03:56:16PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: > On Feb 9, 2009, at 2:06 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> >> No. People have talked about doing that, but it hasn't happened. > > It should be noted that mountd's UMNT and UMNT_ALL requests (used by > NFSv2/v3) are advisory, and that our NFSv4 client doesn't contact the > server at unmount time. We're not talking about a client unmounting a server, but about a server unmounting an exported filesystem. --b.