From: Greg Banks Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/23] SUNRPC: rpcbind actually interprets r_owner string Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:02:07 +1100 Message-ID: <49CD4CDF.8080806@sgi.com> References: <20090319004024.32404.68289.stgit@ingres.1015granger.net> <20090319004713.32404.63163.stgit@ingres.1015granger.net> <49CB439D.5080401@sgi.com> <994CA980-BA59-4F8E-B510-4079A175BFEF@oracle.com> <49CC0D63.8090004@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, bfields@fieldses.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Chuck Lever Return-path: Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.179.30]:49669 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752193AbZC0WCd (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:02:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Chuck Lever wrote: > On Mar 26, 2009, at 7:18 PM, Greg Banks wrote: > > rpcbind then throws this away and uses getsockopt(SO_PEERCRED). On > network sockets I think that's always going to return a uid of -1, but > for AF_LOCAL it will have a meaningful value. Aha. Unconfused now, thanks. -- Greg Banks, P.Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group. the brightly coloured sporks of revolution. I don't speak for SGI.