From: Krishna Kumar2 Subject: Re: nfsd: Improve NFS server performance Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:27:55 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20081230104245.9409.30030.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090204231958.GB20917@fieldses.org> <20090205202401.GH9200@fieldses.org> <20090209190648.GA13636@fieldses.org> <01164826-9C05-41E0-A763-825A9C6E8CFF@oracle.com> <20090209210427.GJ13636@fieldses.org> <20090324180036.GB19389@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jeff Layton , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from e28smtp04.in.ibm.com ([59.145.155.4]:45017 "EHLO e28smtp04.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753160AbZCXTAO (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:00:14 -0400 Received: from d28relay02.in.ibm.com (d28relay02.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.59]) by e28smtp04.in.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2OJ09ie028508 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:30:09 +0530 Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (d28av05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.67]) by d28relay02.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n2OIucf63358784 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:26:39 +0530 Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av05.in.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n2OJ08wt029706 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:00:08 +1100 In-Reply-To: <20090324180036.GB19389@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: OK, I will break the attachments into text files tomorrow :) I will send everything but the profile data once again. thanks, - KK "J. Bruce Fields" wrote on 03/24/2009 11:30:36 PM: > "J. Bruce Fields" > 03/24/2009 11:30 PM > > To > > Krishna Kumar2/India/IBM@IBMIN > > cc > > Jeff Layton , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org > > Subject > > Re: nfsd: Improve NFS server performance > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:13:32PM +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > > > I am sorry about the delay due to some unavoidable circumstances. However, > > I have > > got most of the details that you and Jeff had asked for. I am including: > > > > 1. Patch (on latest git tree): > > (See attached file: patch0) (See attached file: patch1) > > > > 2. Results (for org, using daemon, using workqueue): > > (See attached file: result.daemon) (See attached file: result.wq) > > (See attached file: result.summary) > > > > 3. Profile data (for org, using daemon, using workqueue): > > (See attached file: profiles.bz2) > > > > 4. A small write up: > > (See attached file: write_up) > > > > 5. The test program: > > (See attached file: read_files.c) > > > > Sorry about the large attachment in step #3 above, I didn't know if I > > should put it some place. Also if required, I can submit patches breaking > > up this monolithic one. > > Thanks, I'll take a look (maybe not immediately). Probably Jeff will > too, but as long as a) there's a large monolithic patch, and b) all of > this is in attachments--I'm afraid nobody else may bother. > > So it'd be more helpful to send this information in the body of email > (more than one email if needed)--that way there's a greater chance other > people will pay attention, and (with luck) have some useful idea to > contribute. > > Thanks!--b.